Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


IT Blogwatch's picture
IT Blogwatch

A Daily Digest of IT Blogs from Richi Jennings

Steve Jobs hates Flash (and Ada luvs Chaz)

It's IT Blogwatch: in which Steve Jobs opens fire on Adobe Flash. Not to mention the first (female) computer scientist: a hard-drinking, adulterous, enchantress of numbers...

Jonny Evans reports:

Don't look for any Flash content on the iPhone anytime soon ... Apple CEO Steve Jobs went on record to warn that the iPhone needs a Flash Player that works like it does on a computer, warning that the Flash Lite Player that Adobe Systems Inc. develops for mobile phones isn't sufficiently advanced for an iPhone. "Proper" Flash "performs too slow to be useful" on the iPhone, Jobs warned ... [although he] insisted that Apple maintains a good relationship with Adobe all the same. more

Seth Weintraub adds:

As Apple is a super-secretive organization, any information out of the company gets picked over with a fine-toothed comb. Yesterday's shareholder meeting is no exception. more

Charles Jade offers this gem: [You're fired -Ed.]

Rumors of Flash on the iPhone continue to percolate upwards from the depths of Internet message boards and six-figure analysts' research notes ... [but] Jobs asserted that Flash ran too slowly on the iPhone—which is another way of saying the iPhone isn't fast enough to run Flash ... it seems clear that the "good" relationship that Apple and Adobe enjoy does not include working on Flash for the iPhone ... Whether you love or hate Microsoft, the company does have the resources to compete with Adobe. For that matter, just the possibility of Apple allying with Microsoft to push Silverlight might make Apple's good relationship with Adobe even better. more

Jack Schofield puffs away:

This is likely to upset Adobe, because its strategy is for Flash to be ubiquitous, but it probably doesn't matter much to Jobs. The number of lost sales because the iPhone lacks Flash is probably pretty small, because iPhone sales are themselves pretty small. If it does become a significant barrier, then Apple can easily add it. In the meantime, not supporting Flash (and Java) allows Apple more control over applications on the iPhone. more

John Paczkowski repeats a naughty word:

“Too slow to be useful.” “Not capable of being used on the Web.” That’s a disparaging way of describing the products of a partner with whom you’ve had strained relations over the years, isn’t it. Certainly, it’s not the most diplomatic. But then Jobs isn’t exactly renowned for his diplomacy. As a recent profile of him Fortune explains, “Jobs himself judges the world in binary terms. Products, in his view, are ‘insanely great’ or ’****’ … Subordinates are geniuses or ‘bozos,’ indispensable or no longer relevant. People in his orbit regularly flip, at a second’s notice, from one category to another, in what early Apple colleagues came to call his ‘hero-****head roller coaster.’” more

But Robert Scoble thinks different:

I have not substantiated this with anyone at either Adobe or Apple, so might turn out to be totally false ... [my source] says that he’s seen Flash running on an iPhone in a lab and that it’s been running for quite a while and that it’s not a technical issue that caused Steve Jobs to go public about not putting Adobe’s Flash on the iPhone ... [but that] Adobe is playing hardball with Apple over their PDF renderer. “Adobe wants Apple to use the Adobe PDF renderer.” His thesis? Steve Jobs is playing hard to get to get Adobe to give up this demand.. more

John Gruber notes the possible background to that:

Apple and Adobe aren’t enemies, but they’re certainly competitors, and the history between the two companies is not entirely warm ... NeXT’s operating system graphics system was built entirely around Display Postscript, a technology NeXT licensed from Adobe ... the terms were such that the source code for Display Postscript never left Adobe’s campus — to work on the code, NeXT engineers had to go to Adobe and work in an isolated room with no outside network access. There are people at Apple who remember this arrangement vividly, and not fondly. more

But Jordan Golson just cheers:

Some whiners say what the iPhone provides isn't the real Internet, because it lacks Flash. No kidding, donkeys: It's way better. Thank you, Steve Jobs, for saving us from Flash websites -- the 2008 version of the <BLINK> tag. more

And finally...

Buffer overflow:

Other Computerworld bloggers:

Richi Jennings is an independent analyst/adviser/consultant, specializing in blogging, email, and spam. A 20 year, cross-functional IT veteran, he is also an analyst at Ferris Research. You too can pretend to be Richi's friend on Facebook, or just use boring old email: blogwatch@richi.co.uk.

Previously in IT Blogwatch:

What People Are Saying

Flash is the most insidious garbage software ever developed.

Flash should be outlawed. This piece of crap software results in more wasted time by web users than any other garbage around including Spam. I cannot believe how many idiot website owners get talked into using Flash. This wastes their customer's time, upsets their customers and displays an arrogance that will cost them in the end.
At least Amazon still has the sense NOT to use Flash (granted there may be an occasional ad or two using Flash but it is not mainstream). It is a shame more websites don't use Amazon as one of the best examples of how to setup and continue a website.

Flash the worst?

I would put ActiveX at the lead, with Java a close second. The only reason M$'s product wins is that not only is it crap, it requires IE to run. At least Java will puke on any platform. Flash is a distant third.

Java is bad? Seriously, what

Java is bad? Seriously, what are you thinking? You probably visited some noob programmer's site and your browser crashed because he didn't manage his code correctly and now you feel all 'hate' against Java. Java offers some really awesome interactive functionality (which isn't annoying like flash), if you manage your code correctly.

Yahoo games, Runescape and others are some fairly good examples of Java applet programs.

Adobe && M$ == Insecurity, Bugs, Dumbed down controls, Marketing

I hate Flash too, but also I hate Adobe + M$. Their software is inteded to be used by the computer illiterates, mainly. There are missing the advanced tools, so the work is very uneffective. For example you have to use Notepad instead of VIM, when you install any M$ operating system.

Adobe Flash usually hogs 100% of your CPU power, is very crashy, buggy and beyond it's insecure. DNS Pinning/Rebinding attacks, XSS, Buffer overflows, string formatting vulnerabilities, every possible bug is in there....