Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Sun Set?

Sun has been a company in trouble for years now. Until recently, I was never really worried about it going under. Now, I'm worried.

I have a love/hate relationship with Sun. I love many of their products like the SPARC workstations and much of the goodness in first the SunOS and now Solaris/OpenSolaris operating systems. I hate the results of their internal civil wars, which have made Sun shift like a snake in desert noon-day light from hardware to software company and from proprietary to open-source company.

I felt like I never knew which Sun I'd be meeting: the good Sun, the one that was open-standard and open-source friendly, or the bad Sun, the company that wanted iron-control over every product that it ever touched. I wasn't the only one who was confused by Sun. With every switch back and forth it seemed to me that they lost ground.

The classic example of this was when Sun spent a cool $2-billion to buy Cobalt Networks in late 2000 as the company's passport into the world of low-end Linux servers. A mere three-years later Sun had dumped Cobalt. It was a dead loss.

This split personality problem would continue to show up with Sun's support of SCO and its back and forth approach to open-sourcing first Java and then OpenSolaris.

Once founding CEO Scott McNealy retired and Jonathan Schwartz took the reins in August 2006, I thought Sun was finally settled on a course: the company would be an open-source software company with just enough of a hand in the hardware business to continue to be a player on high-end servers. By focusing on complete open system solutions - software, hardware, services and networks - I thought Sun had a formula that would work.

Unfortunately, while Sun may finally have a steady course, it may have come too late. While the company said things had turned out well in the last quarter, which lead to the company's stock getting a brief boost, reality began to sink in as analysts took a closer look at what Sun had actually said. Their conclusions? Sun actually had a flop of a quarter.

The week before Sun had announced that it would be firing about 1,000 workers, or about 8% of its total work force. It could be more; I've heard rumors of up to 2,500 staffers getting laid off.

The company had also hoped to settle a potentially painful patent dispute with NetApps over its ZFS file system. No such luck. The NetApp case seems to be on its way to litigation. Win, lose, or draw, the resulting court case will be expensive.

That sort of sums up Sun's business in a nutshell. No matter what Sun does, Sun keeps shedding customers. Many of them are being lost to Linux and Sun's least favorite partner Red Hat. OpenSolaris, sorry OS fans, really isn't catching on. In any case, it has a nasty built-in legal time bomb hidden inside it: Novell owns its Unix IP (intellectual property) heart.

On the other hand, I really had thought that Sun adding MySQL to Java and Solaris was a brilliant move. I still do.

I just hope that Sun will survive long enough to make the most of its MySQL acquisition and its now almost two-year old change in course. Unfortunately, this is not an economy that's kind to any company in trouble. Here's hoping that Sun makes it, but, as I said at the start, "I'm worried."

What People Are Saying

BreakUp

Sun is clearly heading towards chapter 11 and then having it's worthy pieces parceled off for what MySQL and JAVA are worth. Sad to say leaving such products to the wolves of the market may result in their demise.

Maybe if management spent

Maybe if management spent less time on their exotic April fools day jokes and more time taking care o' business, they'd be in better shape!

Split personality

I don't think Sun is unique in it's inconsistent directions. In my experience, all of these large corporations suffer from multiple personality disorder. Especially in technology, where there are so many smart and strong willed people even at the lower levels. The idea of all marching in unison behind the CEO is a myth. The reality is people at all levels that range from zealots to semi-loyal to indifferent to saboteurs to outright traitors. They all march in several different directions at the same time.

HP's printer division loves Linux, but their PC division are die-hard opposed. Their laptop people in particular try to choose components that are incompatible with Linux (which gets harder all the time, but they keep trying).

Oracle and others have similar contradictory directions.

MS has probably done the best job of presenting a facade of a united front (perhaps because their leader was known to be so ruthlessly vindictive and amoral that most were afraid to cross him), but even that's starting to crack.

1000 != 8%

Sun employs around 34,000 people. 1000 people is not 8%.

reference for the "nasty built-in legal time bomb?

you had links for everything else. I'd like to see the details.

Everyone from the blogs, to the employees to the investment community is piling on Jonathan. As it should be, he makes the big bucks to sit in the big chair.

But you are not the only one whose worried. Even though the rank and file worked their collective arses off, it was for nuthin. No bonuses for q4, is the message.

See Groklaw and the latest

See Groklaw and the latest details of the SCO v Novell judgements. Basically:

Solaris being a UNIX System V variant contains said code

SCO sold Sun a license to UNIX System V that allowed Sun to open source Solaris. Unfortunately for SCO, it has been judged that SCO did not own the UNIX System V copyrights required for such a license.

Novell owns the license and as of yesterday, SCO has to pay Novell some $2 million, ie. the money they received from Sun for the license.

Novell owns the UNIX System V and has not given Sun leave to open source Solaris, in effect open sourcing SysV. Novell could potentially sue Sun at any time - this is the timebomb

Or, you could just read this

where I covered this possibility in detail two months ago: OpenSolaris Arrives just to Die

This has been hiding back there for a few months. The recent SCO vs. Novell decision, discussed in my post yesterday SCO: The zombie flick's final scene, however has brought it to the forefront.

Steven

the referenced article has an error.

The artice has an error.

OpenSolaris isn't released under the GPL, it's licensed under the CDDL:

http://opensolaris.org/os/licensing/opensolaris_license/