Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Taking a beating with Windows 7 pricing

When you buy a PC what do you think the single most expensive part? Is it the CPU? Nope. The hard drive? No way. It's long been Windows, and, with the coming of Windows 7 on netbooks and lower-priced PCs, Windows may not only be the priciest part, it may cost you more than everything else in the PC combined. Now, that's real value for your money!

Windows 7 Starter Edition is expected to cost netbook vendors $50. That's not much, but it's a good deal more than the $15, and less, it currently costs them to put Windows XP Home on their machines. Adding insult to injury, Microsoft has decided that Starter Edition can only go on a netbooks with a 10.2-in. Or smaller screen , with no more than 1GB of RAM, a hard disk drive of no more than 250GB or a solid-state drive no bigger than 64GB, and a single-core processor no faster than 2 GHz.

In short, if a netbook manufacturer wants to produce a high-end netbook, Microsoft is forcing them to use Windows 7 Home Premium. And, guess what? According to a report, Mike Abary, a senior VP at Sony's Vaio PC unit, says that Windows 7 Home Premium will "add $200 to a unit's cost." On an advanced netbook, or low-end notebook, that could easily mean that Windows is the most expensive part of the entire package.

It's not just the vendors that Microsoft is playing pricing games with. Microsoft has done a great job so far in flimflamming the buying public about Windows 7's pricing so far. First, there's the wildly popular Windows 7 pre-order. The Windows 7 Home Premium upgrade, priced at $49.99 and available, at most, until July 11, moved to the top of Amazon's sales list.

What a deal right? Well, as that 'deal' comes to a close, did you know that it appears Microsoft will be offering a Family Pack of Windows 7. And, that package, good for three computers, may have the same, or lower, price for Windows 7 as the Windows 7 discount deal. As you might imagine, some Windows users aren't happy.

Of course, at least would be Windows 7 customers in North America get some kind of discounts. In Europe, users can expect to pay up to twice as much for Windows 7.

Microsoft, of course, claims that this isn't the case It's just that, in Europe, Bill Veghte, senior VP for the Windows business group, explained, "We typically offer two Windows versions to retail customers: a full version for use on any computer and an upgrade version -- at a lower price -- that can only be used on computers that are already licensed for Windows." But, "In light of recent changes we made to European versions of Window 7, we will not have an upgrade version available in Europe when we release the new operating system."

For those of you poor devils who've been stuck with Vista, Microsoft is also making it clear that you won't be getting a free pass to Windows 7 even if you paid big bucks for Vista Ultimate There's no discount packages available for would-be Windows 7 Ultimate users. Some Vista Ultimate users hoped that they'd get a free upgrade to Windows 7. Forget about it. It's not going to happen.

Last, but never least, let's not forget that, just like Vista before it, the different editions of Windows 7 are just a giant shell game designed to fool you into spending every last dime from your wallet. Figuring out which version of Windows 7 will have the features you need at the price you can afford is a subject I'll take up when we're closer to seeing Windows 7 actually getting delivered.

Until then, let me just say that a good desktop Linux, like Ubuntu 9.04, Fedora 11, and openSUSE 11.1 won't cost you a penny and that when Apple upgrades its operating system to Snow Leopard, it will cost you $29. Period. No extra charges. No half-a-dozen different versions with different requirements and features sets. Apple and the Linux vendors just deliver the goods, not a beating with their desktop operating system offerings. Too bad Microsoft won't follow their lead. Of course, so long as Windows users are willing to pay to be abused, I guess we can count on Microsoft continuing to beat on them.

What People Are Saying

Its the vendors

I have been looking for a netbook/laptop in Singapore for the past 3 months and I have not found a single machine on sale without Windows. They are extremely costly, much costlier than in India, simply because of Windows. In India, vendors are willing to sell laptops/netbooks either with Linux or without an OS allowing you to put in whatever you want, but no such look in Singapore.

I am guessing that MS has managed to cajole/armtwist every single vendor in Singapore to offer machines only with Windows.

Its sad, very sad.

Funny that you should mention Singapore

You're right about not being able to find a laptop without Windows there. I was there recently and it was the first time I have been there and not bought a new laptop because I decided I did not want to buy another laptop with Windows on it as the last two that I bought no longer run Windows, for differing reasons, and I didn't want to pay for Windows yet again.

Piracy is Microsoft best friend

What you all fail to see is that Piracy is Microsoft's best friend when it comes to make them the defacto standard OS, the one most people still think is the ONLY option and comes "preloaded within the PC BIOS almost"!

Of course, piracy also cuts their profits, but that is because they cannot force any price into the people, because the higher the price the more reward comes from avoiding it.

Please stop posting...

...with your pro-piracy propaganda... Saying the same thing 4 times in one conversation is annoying. Come up with something new to say.

It's not propaganda, it's

It's not propaganda, it's just another variable to consider in this matters AND a very important one. It it wasn't for it I bet Microsoft wouldn't be doing as well as they do, they would probably be forced to lower their prices and face stronger competition from Mac or Linux.

Being politically incorrect doesn't mean it does not exist or it not important to notice it.

People are willing to shell out money for Windows

People are willing to hand over their money to Microsoft because Windows is a product worth purchasing. Until Windows has some real competition, and don't mention Linux because it is garbage, Microsoft can charge toward the upper ceiling of what people are willing to pay for an operating system.

Microsoft can't be blamed for doing what any business would do in their shoes. Blame Microsoft's competition for not being able to make a competitive operating system.

Not really

At the point where OS quality is now (ease of use, stability, support paid and/or unpaid, extensibility, applications library, etc.) Linux on a commercial distro I AM willing to pay for, it's that good.
Apple would have to GIVE me free OS/X in order for me to deign running it, and as to Microsoft Windows...
I'D EXPECT TO BE PAID in order to use it,....it's quality is that bad folks....Cleaning up viruses, dealing with registry corruption, preemptive malware measures, driver-download hell; all these are things of the past since I switched everything over to CentOS, Puppy and Ubuntu back around 2005-6.....

I don't know in which

I don't know in which "neighboorhood" do you live in, maybe it's different there... in mine I don't know any single person who purchases Windows directly, even though they have it all on their home computers together with Office.

Sometimes Windows comes with the PC and that's ok for them (they really prefer Windows), but they are NOT willing to pay for it directly. Nor do they buy Office licenses at home.

When I tell them that I use ubuntu/linux because, amongst other things, it's free... some smile and say "Windows and Office are free as well, aren't they?" Others are really convinced that Windows+Office are free of charge, outside a company at least.

People seems willing to pay

People seems willing to pay a bit (not much) more for Windows, but specially IF THEY ARE NOT AWARE of the different options and difference in the price tag...

And Microsoft is NOT stupid and KNOWS that, otherwise WHY would they negotiate with the OEMs SO HARD to make the cost of Windows invisible to end users?
(The infamous Microsoft Tax)

I believe that people's prefences are as more follows:

- If the machine is not TOO expensive and comes with a decent Windows, everything is good!

- If the machine is expensive and/or comes with a crappy version of Windows (like Vista or Win7 "too crippled version") normal users will turn to Emule /Edonkey networks to get their Windows Ultimate "Deluxe" for free. (Most home users do it for Office ANYWAY)

- Others will turn to MAC, if the money is not a problem there it is a better option.

- Few will turn to Linux... specially when they make it MULTIMEDIA RELIABLE (for desktops). That is fix 3D (Intel/X.org are you listening?) and sound (stop the OSS4 vs ALSA debate and make it jus WORK!)

"Linux is garbage". wow.

"Linux is garbage". wow. really? Why do LAMP servers host 90% of the web? or do you even know what the L in LAMP stands for?