Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


The big Windows 7 lie

You've read the early reviews with comments like Windows 7 is a big improvement over Vista and Windows 7 is wicked fast. Sounds great doesn't it? On closer inspection though Windows 7 M3 (Milestone 3) is being revealed as being just a "slightly tweaked version of Vista."

When I said recently that early Windows 7 reviews based on handpicked bribes, ah high-end laptops, to reviewers and bloggers could only give results that were not a lot different from those of a rigged demo I was more right than I knew. Randall Kennedy put the Windows 7 engine on a real test-bench and discovered that, at the kernel level, "When viewed side by side in Performance Monitor, Vista and Windows 7 were virtually indistinguishable."

In case you haven't used Vista, that means you can expect Windows 7 performance to be lousy. Kennedy ran the same application performance tests comparing XP and Vista and found that Vista ran 40% slower than XP. I've said it before, I'll say it again, if you must run Windows, run XP SP3.

Application tests underlined Windows 7's more than skin-deep resemblance to Vista. Kennedy found, "In a nutshell, Windows 7 M3 is a virtual twin of Vista when it comes to performance." There are also peas in a pod when it comes to being resource hogs. Microsoft can talk about how Windows 7 will work great on netbooks and some people can claim that Windows 7 will run desktop Linux off netbooks, but Windows 7 is no more suitable than Vista is for a netbook.

I can't say that I've looked at Windows 7 nearly as closely as Kennedy has, but I've looked at Windows 7 enough to know that it's no real improvement on Vista. Ironically, the best things I can find to say about Windows 7 are the ones that make it look more like XP. UAC (User Access Control) is being loosened up, so you'll no longer have to give explicit permission every time you want to swipe your PC's nose. And, the user interface, while based on Vista Aero, locates commands in a way that has more in common with XP than it does with Vista.

What's really going on here is Microsoft's same old, same old. Microsoft is trying to pull the wool over our eyes by making Windows 7 look great in staged events and by bribing reviewers with expensive laptops. They're also trying to freeze everyone's purchase plans by making Windows 7 sound like the next great thing, so why would you want to consider say Ubuntu 8.10 or a new Mac?

The answer is that if you're sick and tired of being jerked around by Microsoft, and after Vista I would hope some of you would be, now is the perfect time to considering move to Linux or the Mac. Of course, you can keep hoping that Windows 7 will be the next great thing, but, based on what those of us who are taking a real look at what's coming, you're going to be sorely disappointed.

What People Are Saying

he is not promoting linux, stupid

he's advocating continual software improvement through peer review. this is possible in a business environment, but is ultimately limited. one business cannot provide the multiplicity of software needs that exist in the world. ultimately, people must develop and modify software so that it works for them. no point pretending otherwise. software WAS a free for all back in the day. it only became impossibly corporatised in the 80s/90s. advocates of Microsoft are advocates of slavery. ergo, Microsoft advocates are stupid and lack self respect.

What a bunch of unfairly

What a bunch of unfairly biased comments in here?? WHY should have to talk this crappy Vista again & compare it to a new OS?!?? I mean, THIS POST is already OBSOLETE & RETARDED..

There's a new IMPROVED version of Windows 7 which is the RC and had already fixed these sluggish & common BSOD problems that had since the TESTING of Windows 7 Beta!! And here comes the Win7RTM which includes MORE bug fixes & some changes..

Something doesn't seem right here

I recently installed the upgrade kit on my desktop.
I admit, I liked the RC, while I used it. But, quite frankly, I see zero improvement over Vista, and perhaps even slower boot up times, and a few programs that won't work under 7, that did under Vista. Roxio Creator 2009, for instance. Altho, I hear there is a fix. (I should hope so. Its THIS YEARS model).

I am from the planet MS

I am from the planet MS Pessimist and cannot believe that MS have got there act together and produced anything like a superior OS to XPSP3. Vista is annoying, confusing, slow and basically bobins. It also follows the basic principles of anything simple make artiufically more involved than it need be. I have wasted good lic money on it and totally regret it. I dont like this continual MS reduction on where buttons are, my copy of vista fails on basic File system copies and moves, no doubt as a result of some do you really want to do this - oops but we forgot the sys admin message event in this case. Okay so its a very popular 3rd party app that I use. Additionally Vista nullifies common sence - you disable a nw connection and the intelligent os reenables it when you log on and off - presumably there's some intelligent reason for this allowing the proliferation of NW traffic. Push the frontiers MS, stop being protective and invent well architectured sw - there's a long way to go yet and so I will be waiting more than a few years before upgrading to Windows 7. Lets face it Xp is nothing special but it just does work. Hopefully ubuntu or macs will be more pervasive by then.

Look before you leap (or read before you post)

"THIS POST is already OBSOLETE"

What part gave it away? Perhaps the fact it is quite obviously dated NOVEMBER 11, 2008? And here you are commenting on it in September 2009, as if it had just been put up today. So, who is the retarded one?

Hey everyone, I have always

Hey everyone,
I have always used XP then moved to Ubuntu and am now posting of Windows 7 RTM build 7264.(have also used Vista although i try to avoid it)

XP is great but getting old. like for instance no DX 10 and bad networking. Still the best Windows around.

Ubuntu is the fastest best OS around(ITS FREE!)
and super fast, full hardware support.I now use it for everything. It has NO drawbacks.

Windows 7 is better than Vista but same thing slightly refined. May be a bit faster than Vista but is relatively slow and clogs up just like Vista

Vista is the worst OS made in the last couple of years, but it was a pre-release to keep customers busy. so what do you expect.

CONCLUSION:

Use/start using Ubuntu or for more advanced computer people try mandrake,Suse,Kubuntu, or any other Linux version

Why MS S...?

I have EXACTLY the same experience with Ubuntu... and because I have to also use MS for my work; I use the sun virtual box (free) to run XP and boot off the raw disk (super fast)... and even share the same HD (NTFS)... I don't have to pay for stupid spy-ware crap and worry about any viruses and shit!! If you add the cost of the loss of productivity to what you have to pay for the crapy OS and all the virus-ware (thanks to MS), you are nuts to use MS if you don't have to...

One other very important reason to use Ubuntu (or other linux distribution) is the support!!! this sounds crazy, how could an open source OS withought any paying staff have a better support than the MS corp. with trillions of dollors???! Well, when I have a problem with something with my OS (like my IE 8 kept crashing)... I kept looking and could not find a single solution that could work... and this did not even existed onywhere in the MS domain... This is mainly because MS marketting has a lot to say what is allowed to be published? where in the Opensource now you have millions of very smart people from around the world freely participate in a discussion and they take pride is their answers and documentations... then all these responses to the problems are linked and rated by all the same millions... problem solved quickly... no BS.

By the way to those who say that Linux is too difficult to learn, configure, etc... I am not an advanced user by any measure... and I have had a lot smaller learning curve slope with ubuntu than I had getting Vista to work properly.

Shut up.. promoting other OS

You're clearly just advertising Linux here! What this article have to do with Ubuntu?!?? LOL, This OLD review is between Snow Leopard Beta & Windows 7 Milestone 3 (near from beta)..

hmmm...

Do you work ay Microsoft's call center?

i'm totally against linux,

i'm totally against linux, it's a total pain in the backside when you just want to install a simple program and you have to keep flicking to the console all the while.it never gets updated and it is DISGUSTING when it comes to playing games... but lets give it some credit. Linux distros are free, they are great for the average user that just wants to take a look at an auction on eBay or chat with there friends on MSN/Skype. in the scope of things linux is great as long as you don't want to play counter strike using Wine (trust me i tryed and i don't like the look of lag) but if you do your going to HAVE to stick with windows.