Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Subscribe to our e-mail newsletters
For more info on a specific newsletter, click the title. Details will be displayed in a new window.
Computerworld Daily News (First Look and Wrap-Up)
Computerworld Blogs Newsletter
The Weekly Top 10
More E-Mail Newsletters 
Mark Everett Hall's picture
Mark Everett Hall

Sanity as a Service

The dark cloud crowd

There are plenty of people who are, to put it mildly, skeptical about software as a service specifically and cloud computing in general. Richard Stallman, founder of the Free Software Foundation, comes to mind. Ian Betteridge of the Technovia blog is another. And there are plenty more.

Luis Villa sums up the shortcomings of computing in the Internet cloud. But he also brilliantly describes the cool stuff cloud computing offers to users today; options not possible to those ideologically closed thinkers like Stallman, who has labeled SaaS and such a "trap" and "worse than stupidity." However, Villa has a more subtle mind than Stallman and finds unique value in the cloud. Think Facebook. Think Google Earth. Anyone interested in SaaS and cloud computing should read it.

For some cloud critics privacy is a key concern; others fear data loss; vendor-lock-in is yet another worry. All are valid reasons to keep a jaundiced eye when gazing at the possibilities SaaS has to offer you and your business.

Certainly, if privacy is your biggest bugaboo, using any computer anytime anywhere would be the last thing I'd ever do. To mix metaphors: if you don't want to be on anyone's radar, don't get on the grid in the first place.

If data loss is your concern, the solution has always been the same and it's always been simple: backup your information regularly and locally in different media. SaaS does not prevent you from doing so.

Unless you're an open source purist, vendor lock-in has always been a specious issue to me. You have reasons that attract you to a specific product and vendor--Apple Macintosh, Microsoft Windows on Dell, heck, a Saab 9-3 or a Chevy Malibu, for that matter. Vendor choice is not just about computers, after all. We choose a product for features, performance, price, whatever, and unless we want to build it ourselves, we're stuck with whomever we choose to get it from. I believe it's called capitalism.

Despite dark views of cloud computing, when done right, it brightens the day for many a user by solving their important problems. And problem solving is not stupid.

What People Are Saying

SaaS promotes data loss

The biggest problem with cloud, and with SaaS in general, is data loss caused by software obsolescence ... a situation which cannot be solved simply by backups.

I can back up my data religiously, but what happens 10 years from now when I need that data and the software vendor is out of business or the current version no longer supports the format and the old version is no longer available? Without physical control over software there is no simple way to guard against this kind of loss. For a business such a situation is completely unacceptable - few have time or resources to routinely check and, if necessary, format convert all their important archived data. It will be done only when absolutely necessary, if ever.

There are important legal ramifications as well - part of the justification for keeping data long term is to protect the business from lawsuits. The SaaS proponents' stock answer for data longevity is to use open formats like XML. That isn't a solution but simply a cop-out ... and a potentially expensive one at that. Even with open formats, without original software, a business may have to incur considerable development costs to restore usable, or even just "comprehensible", access to archived data.

I have not seen this particular data loss issue mentioned anywhere in recent media coverage. It was touched on briefly during the initial SaaS hype back in the late 90's, but even then it was glossed over and quickly forgotten.