Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Preston Gralla's picture
Preston Gralla

Seeing Through Windows

The U.K.'s hidden crime wave: Wi-Fi freeloaders

If we're to believe the U.K. newspaper The Times, the U.K. is being threatened by a Wi-Fi crime wave, in which Wi-Fi freeloaders commit the "serious offense" of use other people's Wi-Fi networks without their knowledge.

According to The Times, "'Wi-fi tapping' or 'piggybacking' has boomed in the past few years as hackers take advantage of unsecured computers to access the internet without paying for it." The paper goes on to claim that "Police regard it as a serious offence because intruders can download pornographic materials and illegal images without being caught."

Here's the kicker: The newspaper frets that only 11 people have been arrested for the offense.

My reaction is the opposite --- 11 is too many. I've been a Wi-Fi freeloader myself at times, and this is not really a crime. Don't the police in England and Wales have anything better to do than tracking down people looking for a free and open Internet connection? If they have so much time on their hands, maybe they should track down a few soccer hooligans. Or make sure there's no repeat of the London Underground terror attack.

The entire tone of the story is overheated, of course, and written for the fear factor. This should come as no surprise. After all, The Times is owned by shock-and-schlock purveyor Rupert Murdoch. What's next: A Page 3 topless girl covering her assets with a strategically placed laptop?

What People Are Saying

Free wi-fi?

So, Preston, not a crime you say? An open internet connection is free for the taking? Do you look for open padlocks and rattle door knobs too? And if you find one, do you rummage at will? An unlocked car with the keys in the ignition is still NOT YOUR CAR! Long ago, there were no locks on doors because there was no need for them. Dishonest people are the reason locks had to be invented. All the computer security functions we have today had to be invented for the same reason. I'll bet your computer is loaded full with stolen software, or is it?

It *IS* a crime

I have an Internet connection with a monthly usage cap. If a freeloader uses up my monthly cap and forces me into paying for more usage that month, then that's theft - theft of money straight from my pocket.

If a freeloader downloads illegal material (child pornography being an obvious example) then I'm in the frame, but they're not. It would be impossible to trace them.

So freeloading should be tackled by the police, charging the freeloaders with dishonestly obtaining a communication service with intent to avoid payment.

But, hey, there's a solution. Protect your wireless with WPA2 with a randomly chosen pre-shared key. Unbreakable encryption (for the moment) and an unguessable secret. Don't buy any domestic wireless kit that doesn't support this.

If you leave your front door

If you leave your front door you cannot charge anyone for "breaking and entering". Ditto for leaving your car door open and keys on the ignition. Due diligence is expected on the part of the plaintiff. It is definitely not legal, but it is debatable whether it reaches the technical category of "crime".

It certainly is...

If you leave your front door you cannot charge anyone for "breaking and entering".

Nope, can't charge them with murder either. Wrong crime. However, if you enter a house through an unlocked front door, and take anything of value, you can - and will - be charged with burglary. And make no mistake, if you "freeload" off of someone's Wi-Fi, you are entering their home electronically and taking something of value which they have paid for and you have not. It most definately reaches the level of "crime" and I am sure that the authorities will treat it as such. It is difficult to trace, but if caught in the act you will pay a stiff fine, and perhaps serve some time. And you will deserve it.

AD

The criminal mind is a terrible thing to waste... but we try.

FUD

How about "Protect the children"?

The folks at The Times are afraid that a mesh based on free Wi-Fi access would result in a new Internet branch that can no longer be controlled by big companies like Murdoch's clan and their allies also known as "Internet Service Providers", who themselves are by now all part of the entertainment and propaganda (sorry, "news") industry. That is why they spread the usual FUD. Imagine a network where data are hopping from neighbor to neighbour. A democratic network is the last thing Murdoch likes to see. Protect the children - from Murdoch!