Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Preston Gralla's picture
Preston Gralla

Seeing Through Windows

The "Windows Cloud": Microsoft gets it half-right

Microsoft has announced it's developing a new operating system for Internet-based applications, which it's calling the Windows Cloud at the moment. That's a big step forward for Microsoft, but there's some evidence that it may only get the new operating system half-right.

Steve Ballmer today told IT managers at a Microsoft-sponsored conference in London that Microsoft is at work on a Windows Cloud operating system that would make it easy for developers to write cloud-based applications.

That's good news because Microsoft has been very slow to move to cloud-based computing. Google and Amazon, by way of contrast, have been much more aggressive. In the past, Microsoft has seemed to be more intent on protecting Microsoft Office than recognizing that the future of applications is Internet-based.

Ballmer also said that Microsoft is working on developing a version of Office that would allow people to do light editing of Office documents online, rather than using a client version of Office. That's more good news.

But Ballmer also made it clear that it will only go so far into cloud-based computing. When it comes to productivity software like Office, he says, "We want software more powerful than software that runs in a browser."

That's true, but only part of the time. Most of the time, people only use the basics of Office, and so most of the time, online-based versions of it will work perfectly fine.

Eventually, I think Office will become a hybrid of online and client-based. Just the fact that Microsoft is looking at letting people edit documents using an online version of it is a step in the right direction. Ultimately, though, Microsoft will have to take plenty more steps than that.

Like this blog? Subscribe to the RSS feed!

What People Are Saying

Preston I have to disagree.

Preston I have to disagree. The future of applications is NOT Internet-based, at least not all applications. Sure there are benefits to having some things Internet based, but to make a blanket statement like this ridiculous. There will always be a place for local apps. It's common sense. Internet connections can and do go down, and local apps obviously run faster. There will always be a benefit to having a local word processor etc.. Total cloud computing is for those too ignorant to know any better. The real future, for those intelligent enough to grasp it, it a mix of both local and Internet based apps. I suppose the rest will be herded like cattle in which ever direction the marketing hype takes them.

Whoa! Total cloud (i.e.,

Whoa! Total cloud (i.e., internet-based) computing is for those too ignorant to know any better?!?! and that anyone who does not agree with you is not "intelligent enough to grasp it (the real future)?!?!

I strongly suspect, based upon your comments, that you aren't and won't be a contributor in the hard-working teams of software and hardware engineers who are devising new, better ways to adapt the Internet and build data centers to deliver the benefits of software to people.

There used to be lots and lots of people around with your attitude. There don't seem to be so many of you any more. What is happening to you guys?

Ok let me apologize. I

Ok let me apologize. I suppose I came across as a bit harsh. Also I may of unintentionally made it sound like I do not support web based apps at all. That is not the case. I only meant to convey that web based apps are not a replacement for local based apps, and that the future will be a mix of both. I'm sorry I let my emotions get the better of me.

No Problem, really. I do

No Problem, really.

I do think it's curious how I'm getting rated down for what I said, though. People are all over me for that. WTF?

you heard it here first in

you heard it here first in the world.
After the PDC is used to unveil cloud software the WinHEC will be used to unveil cloud hardware for the post-pc era.

Has Microsoft figured out

Has Microsoft figured out how to deliver the benefits of software to people who don't have PC's or who don't want to deal with the befuddlement of PC's? Or has Microsoft simply accepted how it must be done and is getting on with it and won't be bothered by people who think the only way to achieve the benefits of software is with a PC?

"Windows Cloud OS" seems to

"Windows Cloud OS" seems to me like stupid marketing term. Techicaly, it's complete nonsence.
Then, author made little confusion - cloud computing is one thing, software that runs in browser another thing. Cloud computing can be deployed behind browser app, but also behind any app (ex: standalone Office), server process, etc.
If it's main focus is on browser (OS-agnostic), why would Balmer anounced Cloud OS?
Last, client for cloud services is so high layer, that I don't see how it can be related to OS itself. I don't think that preinstalled .NET Framework qualify itself as specialized OS architecture.
What's next? Internet OS, that enables you to browse internet? Ah, no, we already have that one; any Windows with preinstalled IE.