Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Thunderbird continues to idle rather than drive

A few years back, when Mozilla spun Firefox out from the Mozilla Internet Suite, Thunderbird, its e-mail client got almost as much press and attention as the Web browser. Now, Thunderbird appears to be a neglected stepchild.

While Firefox is the most important open-source Web browser and is now at version 3.0.3, Thunderbird is still at version 2.0.0.17 and now its first 3.0 upgrade has been delayed. Rather than release the Thunderbird 3.0 Beta, as had been the plan, Mozilla Messaging, the division of Mozilla developing Thunderbird, has decided instead to release it as Alpha 3.

Mozilla Messaging is doing this because, Dan Mosedale a Thunderbird developer, said in his blog, "Calling something a beta is likely to trigger a bunch of extra press attention that we're not yet in a position to deal with. Some number [of] reviews will be inappropriately pre-judging [Thunderbird 3.0] based on its current state. In the best case, this would be a distraction."

In other words, it's not close to being ready. Mosedale went on, "While we've been pretty clear for a while that calling something a beta doesn't mean that we're feature complete, what we've got now feels like it's pretty far from being representative (from a user-experience and user-visible-change point of view) of what Thunderbird 3 is going to feel like." In other words, really, really not close to being ready.

If you know the history of Thunderbird, it's easy to see how this happened. In July 2007, Mozilla CEO Mitchell Baker admitted that Thunderbird was coming in a distant second to Firefox at Mozilla. At the time, Mozilla wasn't at all sure what to do with Thunderbird. Baker wrote, "We have concluded that we should find a new, separate organizational setting for Thunderbird; one that allows the Thunderbird community to determine its own destiny."

That said, Mozilla didn't know what to do with it next. A few months later, in September 2007, Mozilla spun Thunderbird's development into a company of its own. That company got off to a very slow start. In fact, it would be fairer to say that it stalled out.

In February 2008, for example, some security bugs were discovered in both Firefox and Thunderbird. Those problems were fixed promptly in Firefox, but, while it was reported that they were fixed in Thunderbird, they actually were not fixed until a later version of the Thunderbird. This trend continued through 2008 to date. For instance, several Firefox security problems were fixed in the late spring and summer, but were only fixed in Thunderbird in July 2008.

Clearly, things haven't changed. Thunderbird is still a distant number two to Firefox. I think that's a shame. I've always preferred e-mail clients to getting to my e-mail via a Web browser. Or, perhaps, I'm in the minority and Web-based e-mail will be what everyone will be using in the future. These continued delays in Thunderbird's development certainly show that's how Mozilla sees it.

What People Are Saying

I too use it for all my

I too use it for all my email but cannot use it for corporate calendering. I use Outlook in an XP Virtualbox. Archiving is about the only thing I hope for as there aren't even any add-ons that will periodically archive to specific folders.

I love it

Personally I think thunderbird is just fabulous... after using pegasus on windows, moving to linux & trying several clients like kmail and others I have come to love how thunderbird works.

As I have more features than I personally need with current version of thunderbird I see no issue in new versions release date - it will be ready when it will and I'm glad that mozilla is not rushing it, putting out alpha-stage software and calling it beta-stage (or final-stage, as M$ would propably do ;) ).

OpenOffice.org 3.0 is much more friendly toward Thunderbird (wat

OpenOffice.org 3.0 is much more friendly toward Thunderbird (watch this as SUN likes it too maybe)?
Some of the OOo 3.0 pages indicate a interoperability between OOo and Thunderbird that never existed before.

Go to the OOo web site (check out the feature list of things going on with the 3.0 version due out on the 13th of Oct. What do you find? What does this mean?

Exchange Client?

Considering most of the business world uses Exchange servers, it would be nice to have a third party client that could support exchange with the included bonus of being stable.

The extension on Evolution is very unstable and using IMAP to connect to an exchange server is not the same.

With that said I like Thunderbird but have little use for it until the above happens, until that day I have to rely on Wine and outlook.

Evolution/Exchange

Actually, I've been finding Evolution to work quite well with Exchange over the last year or two. You may want to take another look at it.

Personally, Evolution is my favorite e-mail/groupware client.

Steven

TB 3 Alpha 2

I've been running Thunderbird 3 Alpha 2 on my Windows XP desktop. While, I haven't discovered a whole lot of new features, it has vastly improved performance for IMAP. That's a really big plus, from my perspective.

More support/promotion from Mozilla or the Messaging folks would be appreciated though. Especially, when using TB in an enterprise environment. Makes the CIO and company a little nervous when they're not confident of what the future holds for the email client.

Thunderbird was great but it's Claws time now

When the story broke about Thunderbird I decided to look for a a new client. I was one of the biggest TB fan, nothing could beat TB but I knew with the fuss about TB it could be wise to find a replacement. Evolution was way to heavy for me and decided to give Claws Mail a try. I'm glad I did, I've used it for almost a year now. It has been the best thing I've done. I can't really imagine going back to TB now a days, even when they do come out with a version3.

Back in 2007 I wrote a comparison between the two on my blog (http://blog.avirtualhome.com/2007/10/27/claws-mail-vs-thunderbird-a-comparison/) . Claws Mail has only improved over time, while TB has been standing still.

Give it a try, you won't regret it. I'm not a devloper of Claws Mail, just an user.

Claws mail for Windows at

Claws mail for Windows at least is not as robust as TB as it stands right now. It does not support two big features; spell checking and bayes filtering. That alone is a show stopper for me.

Thunderbird Is Great

Thunderbird is a great mail client. While Evolution is a more comprehensive package with its Calandar, Tasks and Memos, Thunderbird is a superior mail client, by far. At one time or another I have tried them all; Outlook, Lotus Notes, Evolution, etc.. However, I always come back to Thunderbird which, as a standalone mail client, is superior to them all. Sure, I hope that Mozilla can figure out a way to better fund Thunderbird. But even with things as they are, Thunderbird is a superior mail client to every thing else out there.

No email client compares to Thunderbird

I too have tried many email clients (Outlook, Outlook Express, Evolution, KMail) plus have used most major web based email (GMail, Yahoo, Hotmail). IMHO, nothing comes close to Thunderbird extended with the Lightning Calendar extension and the Provider for Google Calendar Extension.

I use it as my front-end for all my web based clients (POP and IMAP) although I mainly set spam filtering/flagging on the ISP side so I don't have to waste local CPU resources to filter out and flag spam.