Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Ubuntu + IBM = Choice corporate Linux desktop?

I can set up a Linux desktop from bare metal to working customized desktop in about an hour. I can set up several dozens Linux desktops for an SMB (small to medium sized business) in a day. I can't, however, roll out several hundred or thousands Linux desktops without a lot of help, time and work. Now, thanks to a partnership between Canonical, the company behind Ubuntu, and IBM, there's a way to roll out corporate Linux desktops almost as fast as you can plug them into the network.

IBM pulls this trick up by using the old thin-client approach. Instead of having a full-out desktop on every desk, users have computers that pick up their desktop applications using Virtual Bridges' VERDE (Virtual Enterprise Remote Desktop Environment) virtualization software.

Even old Linux hands may not recognize the Virtual Bridges name, but they will know its products. Virtual Bridges is the company behind Win4Lin, one of the first and best of the Windows on Linux virtualization programs.

VERDE, however, is pure Linux software stack. Here's how it all comes together. On your PCs, you'll install Ubuntu 8.04 with Firefox and all of its usual packaged programs. This is a vanilla installation so it can quickly be dropped on multiple systems. On top of that, you'll also put VERDE. Then, using VERDE and your network, your users pick up the office desktop image.

This desktop is made up of three main applications: the Lotus Notes client, the Sametime IM client and the OpenOffice-based Symphony office suite. These, in turn, are supported by IBM server and middleware programs on a variety of different platforms.

The point of this offering is two fold. One is, of course, to push the Linux desktop over the Windows desktop. But, there's also another purely pragmatic reason for this bundle: It's cheap.

Inna Kuznetsova, director of IBM Linux Strategy, said that it's a "solution to keep IT costs down." With the software stack, system administrators can let end users sign up from any corporate-networked PC and access their desktop applications. This can also work over the Internet with VPN (virtual private networks). Kuznetsova added, "As your desktop machine supports certain protocols, you can access and use it. It's all being stored on the server, so all the upgrades and updates can be performed on the server simultaneously by the system administrator." Centralized management, just as much as using the low-cost, secure Ubuntu Linux for the desktop, also cuts down costs.

How cheap is it? You can buy the package, starting at $49 per seat for a 1,000-seat deployment from IBM Global Services or IBM resellers. There are, of course, other volume discounts. As Kuznetsova observed, ""We are certainly cheaper than migrating to Office 2007 on Vista."

You can say that again. Although, I confess, I can't imagine even the most hard-core Windows CIO recommending that any business switch to Vista. Even Microsoft has given up on pushing Vista to businesses.

More to the point, and leaving Linux vs. Windows out of it, if you need to cut IT costs on the desktop, the Canonical/IBM/Virtual Bridges stack demands you at least consider it. It's affordable, it should work extremely well, and it has serious top companies behind it. In an insane economy, this desktop software stack is a really sane choice.

What People Are Saying

Is it just me, or would

Is it just me, or would NetBoot not be a lot easier than this?

Crazy Talk

I know this sounds like crazy talk, but there are times when I get the impression that IBM doesn't like Microsoft!

Use PuppetD instead

Man, enterprises just LOVE to blow all their money away to IBM, Novell and Microsoft, dont they?

When they can simply use EXISTING Linux open source, FREE software to do the job, in an even EASIER way!

Check out http://reductivelabs.com/

It does all your adminitration, centrally, costs NOTHING, and has commercial support, for enterprises needing long term support and assurance.

Why,oh why do CIO's and other large Corps INSIST they have to pay MILLIONS to get the job down?

You can use PuppetD and deploy as many Ubuntu's as you want, and change all million of them from a central location with a flick of a VI file edit.

People, get smart, or GO BROKE.

Am I the only one who thinks

Am I the only one who thinks it's a bit silly to virtualize linux desktops? I mean, what do you gain? Unlike certain other OS's I could mention, Linux is and has always been a multi-user OS. Wouldn't it be far more efficient to use something like LTSP? Why waste all those resources simulating hardware when Linux can handle this?

consolidating

No your not, obviously adding another abstraction layer between OS and bare-metal adds overhead, as any abstraction layer you also gain advantages to move your whole sw stack between hosts, you also gain yet a sw based isolation layer demanded by many clients. especially if you want to have customers put together on the same big iron mainframe but wont let them eat all your hw partitions.

LTSP vs Virtualization

If you want 10 clients, or even 100, LTSP is a good idea. If you want 10,000 clients, probably not.

Yes, problems are opportunities for new solutions.

Vista is a problem.

Waiting for VistaII is a problem.

What to do with quad core CPUs and gigabytes of RAM is a problem.

Putting GNU/Linux on terminal servers choked with cores, RAM and storage is a great solution. Your applications get to access data at warp speed. You have no per-seat licence fees. Thin clients last indefinitely. You have far less software installations/updates to do.

By coincidence, I am trying out a batch of new thin clients today. Users will be able to login in 7s instead of 45s on boxes that cost about $129 and freight (a lot less freight, too). I can get this kind of performance on an old network that groans under the weight of that other OS. Solution: keep the data off the network. My server upgrade should be in by Christmas. It will be a happier New Year, 2009.

The Clock.

It looks like the Microsoft Doomsday Clock has ticked a little closer to midnight.