Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Ubuntu to work more with larger Linux community

Some people hate Ubuntu. I know, I know, far, far more people love Ubuntu, but that doesn't change the fact that others really dislike it. Hate is not too strong a word.

Those who hate Ubuntu tend to fall into two groups. There are those who dislike Ubuntu because it makes Linux too easy. To these people, I say: "Get over it. Linux isn't just for people with EMACS macros hard-wired into their fingers anymore." The other group are those, usually Debian Linux users, who think Ubuntu, which is based on Debian, has 'stolen' their work and that its developers haven't contributed enough back to Debian or the other open-source communities that create Linux-related software.

That's about to change. Mark Shuttleworth, CEO of Canonical, the company behind Ubuntu, announced in his blog that Canonical will be "hiring a team who will work on X, OpenGL, Gtk, Qt, GNOME and KDE, with a view to doing some of the heavy lifting required to turn those desktop experience ideas into reality." "Those desktop experiences ideas" are Ubuntu's design ideas. Shuttleworth recently said he wanted the Linux desktop to be better than the Mac's interface. He's now putting his money behind this idea.

Shuttleworth knows that achieving such a goal won't be easy. "When I laid out the goal of 'delivering a user experience that can compete with Apple in two years' at OSCON, I had many questions afterwards about how on earth we could achieve that.'Everyone scratches their own itch, how can you possibly make the UI consistent?' was a common theme. And it's true - the free software desktop is often patchy and inconsistent. But I see the lack of consistency as both a weakness (GNOME, OpenOffice and Firefox all have different UI toolkits, and it's very difficult to make them seamless) and as a strength -- people are free to innovate, and the results are world-leading. Our challenge is to get the best of both of those worlds."

Mark Shuttleworth is well aware that some people see Ubuntu as not being a contributor. "In Ubuntu we have in general considered upstream to be "our ROCK", by which we mean that we want upstream to be happy with the way we express their ideas and their work." The upstream is Debian, the Linux kernel developers, and Linux-related software programmers." Shuttleworth continued, "More than happy - we want upstream to be delighted! We focus most of our effort on integration. Our competitors turn that into "Canonical doesn't contribute" but it's more accurate to say we measure our contribution in the effectiveness with which we get the latest stable work of upstream, with security maintenance, to the widest possible audience for testing and love. To my mind, that's a huge contribution."

But, that's no longer enough. Shuttleworth opened his comments by writing, "When you present yourself on the web, you have 15 seconds to make an impression, so aspiring champions of the web 2.0 industry have converged on a good recipe for success:

1. Make your site visually appealing,
2. Do something different and do it very, very well,
3. Call users to action and give them an immediate, rewarding experience.

We need the same urgency, immediacy and elegance as part of the free software desktop experience, and that's an area where Canonical will, I hope, make a significant contribution. We are hiring designers, user experience champions and interaction design visionaries and challenging them to lead not only Canonical's distinctive projects but also to participate in GNOME, KDE and other upstream efforts to improve FLOSS (Free/Libre/Open Source Software) usability."

So, starting now, Ubuntu is going to contribute in a big way to desktop Linux. Shuttleworth wrote, "Canonical is in a position to drive real change in the software that is part of Ubuntu. If we just showed up with pictures and prototypes and asked people to shape their projects differently, I can't imagine that being well received! So we are also hiring a team who will work on X, OpenGL, Gtk, Qt, GNOME and KDE, with a view to doing some of the heavy lifting required to turn those desktop experience ideas into reality. Those teams will publish their Bazaar branches in Launchpad and of course submit their work upstream, and participate in upstream sprints and events. Some of the folks we have hired into those positions are familiar contributors in the FLOSS world; others will be developers with relevant technical expertise from other industries."

I was one of those that doubted that desktop Linux could ever equal the smooth, graceful integration of the Mac OS. Now, between the driving pace of open-source development, and Shuttleworth's millions, I can see it happening. Why not? After all, Mac OS itself is based on FreeBSD. Desktop Linux's future, despite Lenovo's recent retirement from retail desktop Linux sales, is starting to look brighter.

What People Are Saying

this news item is obvious

this news item is obvious copyright infringment.

i see this more and more thesee days people just copying wholesale off of other sites without actually adding any decent commentary

Why have a password? I just

Why have a password? I just want to turn on my computer and use it! No I don't need a password at all!

Man, you've ever seen the

Man, you've ever seen the Auto-Login Options???

You forgot one category

You forgot the category of people who think that Ubuntu is not only bringing good to the development of linux because it is supported by M.Suttleworth's fortune that many other innovative linux distribution don't have. As a consequence, many of those linux distribution struggle to stay on the market albeit offering very good products...
Ubuntu is kind of moving against one of linux's strength: diversity.

underestimating the GPL

>Ubuntu is kind of moving against one of linux's >strength: diversity.

I dont agree. As long as KDE, Gnome and XFCE (a must) are equally supported and no favoritism is played, any changes will benefit us all because of the beauty of the GPL.
Ubuntu wont have any advantage since all distros will have the same code (apart from Launchpad and a few 'ahem', exceptions).

Yes, there is the danger that Ubuntu becomes synonymous with Linux but as a free software developer and GPL supporter, I must say that flyboy has almost always said the right things which is more than I can say for many in the community (looking at you Linus and Miguel).

I trust him (as well as that british Lug, Jono) for doing things that wont harm or divide the community to give itself an advantage.
Basically, I trust them not to be Novell.

I use Gentoo/Mandriva at home and PCLinuxOS for family and friends so Im no Buntufanboi. I did use Xubuntu on my old Thinkpad until it flatlined.

I dislike Ubuntu because for

I dislike Ubuntu because for example it doesn't include drivers for the NVidia FakeRAID chipsets, although those are available and working for Debian. I also dislike that when one explicitly specifies not to use DHCP during installation Ubuntu uses DHCP anyways and when switching over to fixed IP just disables the entire ethernet driver.
Ubuntu is otherwise nice, but there are really some fundamental things that are goofed up. Also, the software repositories also don't provide the current versions of software. Took forever to have FF3 show up, but there are other ways.
Another crapshoot is GRUB. Why can't I simply configure boot options right from the boot menu, such as which partition / OS I want to boot by default?
Ubuntu as well as any other Linux flavour will continue to suck as long as the common hardware (and yes, FakeRAIDs are common these days!!!) isn't supported for pure ideological reasons. Yea, I know, Linux's software RAID may be much better than the FakeRAIDs, but explain that to the ignorant Windows.

Linux doesn't have to

Linux doesn't have to explain anything to Windows users, even ones converting to Linux.



Frankly the mentality that Linux is no good simply because "it is not like Windows" is more of an indication that the user really just likes Windows and is more a Windows fanboy than anything.



As for FakeRAID, I don't think it *is* as common as you say, at least, I have yet to buy a machine with it. And it's not really Linux's fault that HARDWARE MANUFACTURERS don't provide drivers. I find that all my hardware down to the last capacitor on my motherboard works out-of-the-box with Ubuntu, which it more than I can say for Windows.

Jin

If you havent made the switch to Linux yet, I dont know what you are waiting for!

JIff
www.crypted.de.tc

People are waiting for it

People are waiting for it not to suck, and to be useful. Nowhere on the horizon, though.

Troll. Linux is more useful

Troll.

Linux is more useful than Windows. The only thing Windows has that Linux doesn't is games, and unless the average uer is a hardcore gamer, Linux is more than enough.