Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Subscribe to our e-mail newsletters
For more info on a specific newsletter, click the title. Details will be displayed in a new window.
Computerworld Daily News (First Look and Wrap-Up)
Computerworld Blogs Newsletter
The Weekly Top 10
More E-Mail Newsletters 

We already had the year of the Linux desktop

I love the illustration for a Linux Haxor story, Obligatory Year-End Positive Linux Predictions. It features Bart Simpson at the school blackboard, which is covered with "Year of the Linux desktop." I understand all too well how people can tire of endless predictions that this (fill-in-the-blank) year will be the year of the Linux desktop. There's only one problem with all these predictions. We've already had the year of the Linux desktop.

For me, it's been the 'year' of the Linux desktop since 1995. That's when I started using Linux on a regular basis. My first distribution was Slackware. Slackware is still around, and it's still a fine Linux for people like me who came to Linux from Unix.

Let's get real though. There have never been that many people to whom the arguments over whether the Bourne, C, Korn, or Bash shells were the best desktops really mattered. I still maintain, however, that Korn is the best since you can do serious programming in it while maintaining backwards compatibility. OK, so that kind of thing still matters to me and to other die-hard Linux/Unix users, but no one else really cares.

For most users, I think 2005 was the year of the Linux desktop. That was the year that Novell introduced SLED (SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop) 9.3. What was important about that? It was the first desktop Linux, in my opinion, that you could put down in front of an office-worker and expect them to get up to speed on it as quickly as they would on Windows and get just as much work done.

In other words, 2005 was the year that the Linux desktop became a business desktop.

Not good enough for you? How about 2007 then? That's the year the first major computer company, Dell, started shipping pre-installed Ubuntu Linux on its desktops and laptops. You no longer needed to be willing to trust a small company that supported Linux or install it yourself. With Dell's move you could get Linux already ready to run as soon as you plugged the cord in the wall on a big name PC.

Still don't believe it? How about later in 2007 when Asus introduced the first Eee UMPC (Ultra mobile PC) or, as we tend to call them now, netbooks? Or, when it became apparent that everyone wanted a netbook of their own?

In fact, Linux-powered netbooks became so popular that less than six months after they first appeared, Microsoft was forced to renew XP Home's lease on life. That makes a good marker doesn't it? After all, Microsoft did change its desktop operating system plans because of the Linux desktop. Even now, with Microsoft almost giving away XP Home to vendors, three out of ten netbooks are still coming out with Linux.

Or, to continue with other major events in Linux desktop history, 2008 was also the year that HP started shipping pre-installed Linux to ordinary users. HP had been the last hold-out. Now all the major OEMs (original equipment manufacturers) have at least one widely available desktop Linux system.

Of course, while all this was happening, the top Linux vendors and communities, such as Canonical/Ubuntu, Novell/openSUSE, and Red Hat/Fedora, have been continuing to push the Linux desktop's evolution forward. You may have to wait for years between major Windows 'upgrades' or Mac versions, but desktop Linux is changing for the better on an average of new, significant updates twice a year.

So what, you say you'll never use Linux on the desktop anyway? I hate to break this to you, but almost everyone already is running Linux-based applications on their desktops. Google and its applications run on Linux. Every time you do a Google search, read a Gmail, work on a Google document, you're using Linux. You prefer Yahoo? Guess what? Their servers and applications are built on Linux as well. Ever buy anything with PayPal? Yep, that runs on Linux too. So, if you spend a lot of your time on the Web, congratulations, you too are a Linux desktop user. You're just not aware of it, the same way that you might not know that if you use TiVo to record TV shows, you're a Linux user.

So, you can talk about the year of the Linux desktop coming all you want. The truth of the matter is that the year of the Linux desktop has already come and gone. The only real question is when your 'personal' year of the Linux desktop will be coming. Heck, for that matter, with SplashTop, the instant-on Linux now being embedded into many laptops and, your personal year of the Linux desktop may already have arrived. The future of the Linux desktop is now.

What People Are Saying

It's always Year of the

It's always Year of the Linux Desktop you silly wabbit.

2008: The Year of Vista-64

On the consumer side, Vista-64 Preinstalled became the dominant operating system in 2008.

(OEMs have pretty much phased out Vista-32.)

And Vista SP1 Preinstalled works just fine.

Statistics are not your friend

less than 5% of computers sold in 2008 were 64-bit Vista, so how are you claiming it is dominant. I am glad that the 64-bit version of Vista is having some success so it will not be the epic fail with drivers that 64-bit XP was. 32-bit Vista still has better driver support and more testing done with it, even then it would be hard to declare it the dominant OS of 2008 either given that it's best news was that some of the flaws from 2007 were corrected with SP1.

Gmail a linux app

If Google apps are running on Linux, then I along with 10's of millions of users are using Linux desktop apps every day.

Linux is everywhere...

While not necessarily a "desktop", it should be noted that many people have at least one thing running Linux in their home, even if it isn't a Tivo. Almost all new TVs, DVD players, and "Set Top" boxes run some form of Linux, as do many of the new NAS devices and media players. Besides Tivo, many other PVRs for satellite and cable also run Linux.

For me- 2006 was the year of the Linux Desktop- that's when I dumped Windows at home and at work for Ubuntu. Thanks for Vista, Microsoft!

You are wrong, Linux is dying

It's a nice thought but I'd like a bit more reality mixed in...

1. Linux has not been able to break 1.5% marketshare since I have been reading these "200x is the year of the Linux" articles since the year 2000.

2. Dell + Ubuntu was a shame.

3. Novell Linux success was a result of a Microsoft partnership.

4. Microsoft has sold more Vista Licenses then any other OS in history.

5. The only people that think Vista "sucks" are angry 14 years olds that and have nothing better to do.

6. Canonical cannot find a business model that works to save it's life and Ubuntu is slowly dying.

windows is already dead

1.there are plenty of people who dual boot and stats are easily manipulated .A lot of people if they haven't at least tried linux they know someone who does.That has to be more than 1,5%.

2, dell + Ubuntu could have been better but it was mostly dell's fault that they didn't do better NOT linux's fault.

3. Novell could kiss off M$ and still do well.
Other distros do so why not?

4. Selling more licenses dosen't mean higher quality .Almost everyone I've talked to that has it hates Vista .Even Bill Gates said it sucks.Microsoft is telling companies to switch to Windows 7 instead and how many decided to use xp instead? Linux is still doing quite well in the internet server arena.

5.I'm not 14 and oh I'm sorry ,but Vista still sucks dead rabbits through a straw.

6.Microsoft is planning it's post windows OS and so it appears Windows 7 may be the last.That means windows is already dead.If Ubuntu fails there's plenty of linuxes to choose from.Personally I like Mandriva the best.

Linux dies when we die

I love how point #2 is a blog. When facts fail, use opinion, right?

#4 is also pretty silly. Microsoft doesn't 'sell' Vista licenses. It puts them pre-installed on laptops and everytime a laptop with vista is sold, they count it as a license. Now if they monitored how many people upgraded to XP or Linux, the number would be much smaller.

#5 is also opinion.

#6 is based off another blog. That said, software should be free because it benefits the community and the user, not the company. Maybe the idea of a corporation with some semblance of a heart escapes you, but not everyone is driven by money, evil, etc.

So when Microsoft goes down in market and no longer has the money to keep its Operating System usable, I'm glad you'll have another OS to keep you afloat in times of trouble.

No, Vista does suck

And I am not 14, I am 46, and I have better things to do then mess around with an OS that is useless. And as for XP, I have to use that garbage OS everyday at work, and it sucks just as bad. So keep your age bias, and your MS love to yourself. When you have met every single person that thinks Vista sucks, then you can have an age opinion (and since several of the developers here are not 14, you are wrong already) but not until.

GNU/Linux is alive and well

Rumors of the stagnation of GNU/Linux are way overblown. In the latest NetApplications reports, that other OS shows less than 90%. In the rest of the world, I would expect share to be even lower. Apple sells a bit over 3% of PCs in the world so GNU/Linux is at least 7%. Several countries promote GNU/Linux and numbers are up to 20% in Brazil.

At the rate of growth of GNU/Linux, its presence cannot be ignored no matter how much the trolls post.