Ads by TechWords
Subscribe to our e-mail newsletters
For more info on a specific newsletter, click the title. Details will be displayed in a new window.
Computerworld Daily News (First Look and Wrap-Up)
Computerworld Blogs Newsletter
The Weekly Top 10
More E-Mail Newsletters 

What private data?

Rate this
Rated +14
258 Votes

It's not clear what information exactly was illegally accessed from the passport records of Senators Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and John McCain by the three contractors working for the U.S. Department of State. From an official description of what constitutes a passport record, the contractors could have seen anything, including the presidential candidates' Social Security numbers; copies of their birth and baptismal certificates; medical records, personal data and financial reports; and other information. The contractors likely were caught only because they snooped on the wrong records. If it had been a Joe-nobody's record they were looking at, chances are they'd have gotten away with it according to analysts.

Scary as that is, what's scarier, according to privacy advocates, is that a lot of information that most people would consider pretty private is available out there in abundance and legitimately to anyone who wants it. Sometimes for a fee, sometimes for free if you know where to look for it.

Consider this: Yesterday, I read the death certificate of a man who died in April 1994 in Maricopa County, Arizona. He was 43 at the time of his death and had lived in Arizona for 13 years after moving there from Nebraska. He died of cancer of the bowel approximately three years and five months after the initial onset of the disease. An attached copy of a joint tenancy deed informed me that his wife got ownership of their property after his death.

I also read about a former executive of a utility company who died at the age of 85 from a combination of Alzheimer's disease and a "failure to thrive," and about a 75-year-old former engineer from Mesa whose wife got their $96,000 property after he died of cardiac problems in 1998.

I read other stuff as well. Like the final divorce decree document of a couple from Chandler, Ariz., where the wife got to keep custody of the children, as well as the house, the Nissan Armada, the Nissan Sentra and all associated debts. The husband got about $103,000, which was his share of the equity in their home, as well as parenting time with the kids every other weekend starting after school on Friday through Sunday at 3:00 p.m. He also got to spend Christmas and New Year's with the kids on all even-numbered years, while his wife got them on the odd-numbered ones.

I didn't know any of these individuals, but I didn't need to break into any systems to get this information on them, either. All of these details were contained in images of public records that the Maricopa County clerk decided to make available for online access to anybody anywhere in the world who wants to view or purchase them.

Maricopa is just one of numerous county governments in multiple states around the country that are posting copies of public records on their Web sites. The list of document images posted as part of the public record can include copies of property and tax records, motor vehicle information and court files. In some cases, documents relating to military discharges, family court records, juvenile court records and probate law are posted online for all to see. Among the pieces of personally identifiable information that such documents can contain are Social Security numbers, dates of birth, addresses, driver's license numbers, vehicle registration information, height and race of individuals and names and birth dates of minors.

These are all records that by law and by definition are required to be made available to anyone who asks for them. Putting them on the Web has made access easier for businesses that might legitimately need the information, such as title companies. But it has also put the documents within the reach of just about everyone else with Internet access

In Maricopa's case, the county recorder's office had redacted out the Social Security numbers before posting documents online, at least with the ones I saw. Not all county governments do that. In Virginia, 84 of the state's 121 counties post unredacted public documents on their Web sites, according to Betty "BJ" Ostergren, a privacy advocate based in Virginia's Hanover County. Fairfax County alone has more than 30 million online records, about 6 million of them containing Social Security numbers, that can be accessed and downloaded by anyone with an Internet connection by paying a $25 per month subscription fee, Ostergren says. A couple of years ago, Fort Bend County in Texas sold a database containing about 20 million unredacted public records to a Florida company for $2,500. It would have cost that company $1 per record in the county clerk's office.

Ostergren runs a Web site called The Virginia Watchdog, which she has been using for the past few years to highlight the privacy problems that she claims can result from the posting of unredacted public records on county and state government Web sites. She has chronicled dozens of cases in which local governments have inadvertently exposed Social Security numbers and other personal data through their Web sites. She says the practice has made these sites a gold mine for identity thieves.

In addition, it has opened up avenues for all sorts of people-finder and background checking services that for under $50 promise to dig up information ranging from phone numbers and addresses to birth dates, names of household members, home values, incomes, criminal histories and other data. A lot of this is from public records. There are companies in countries like India and the Philippines that have downloaded pretty much all of the public records that are available out there and are now selling that information back to whoever wants it.

Just maybe if the State Department contractors had simply signed up for a service like that, they'd have gotten all of the information they were looking for, and still have their jobs. Who knows?

What People Are Saying

Rate this
Rated +6
196 Votes

ID Theft? not really

Indications are that most ID Theft happens in the following less dramatic ways:

1) Dumptser Diving
2) Breaking into Mailboxes
3) Handing your credit card to a waitress to ring up your bill.

The information in the documents about *dead* people are important for historical purposes as well as academic research - i.e. are their clusters of disease in a certain area?

They should be available on paper as they currently are and online. If someone really wants the data on you they can already get it.

You should lock your credit files for no instant issuance of credit - requiring a phone call to you before an application is processed.

Rate this
Rated +13
199 Votes

Social security numbers.

Anybody want Jeb Bushes SSI number? It was posted online by an 85 year old lady who found it on a public record search.

She also posted the ex CIA boss a Mr. Podesta SSI number.

I thought about using Mr. privacy for himself and nobody else Dick Cheney's number as my tag line. He has a Man sized safe in his office and his house removed from google earth, but I got his SSI number(it's very easy to do!)

I'm not going into detail(I have been the victim of ID theft twice!) But it's really easy to get a Social security number.

Oh a major medical insurance company had ALL of their patient information "copied" when they outsourced it to a country that has no laws preventing it. Thats why I said "copied" not stolen.

Rate this
Rated +7
205 Votes

You reap what you sow

This is what happens when folks rush headlong into adopting technology without thoroughly examining the unintended consequences that may result.

Government officials rushed to put public documents online because the technology was gee-whiz.
Open Records advocates demanded fuller access to information not realizing what might happen.

Well now we see what is happening. Maybe if professional records managers had been included in the process many of the problems we see erupting could have been avoided.

Rate this
Rated +1
239 Votes

Reform of Public Records Laws

Our legislators really need to take a close, hard look at our out-dated public records laws. The existing laws never anticipated the technology that we have today. I am all for open access to public records, but it must be done sensibly - posting them all online may not be sensible.

Consider this:

" In 1997, Arizona’s Maricopa County (which includes Phoenix) became the first government entity in the nation to post public records online. The decision to post a blizzard of records, including land purchases, election information, tax information, divorce cases and much more, garnered praise from the local press and won Maricopa a place in the Smithsonian’s prestigious National IT Innovation Collection. But it has come back to bite the county in a most unpleasant way: Maricopa now claims the highest rate of identity theft in the nation, and local IT officials say the two statistics are inextricably linked."

Source: http://www.cio.com/article/16011

That should be enough to alert our government to the problem. Unfortunately, the local governments seem to favor the Internet as a medium for publishing those records.

Rate this
Rated -2
250 Votes

What's Private Data article

This article is an example of sensationalizing a rare practice and attempting to create a view that that is the norm.
Yes, Maricopa is one of the few local government agencies that places public record images on the web. By far and away, most government websites that offer public record searching restrict access to only searches of dockets of indices, but not of public record document images. Of the 10,000+ courts and 3,400+ recording offices in the U.S., less than half provide online access, and probably less than 2% offer images freely on the web in the manner that Maricopa County does. There are numerous sources to back up this statement.
Also, note the term “public record” is used when describing these situation.
The statement that motor vehicle data containing personal information is found in numerous places is also misleading. All states abide by the federal Driver’s Privacy Protection Act which protects the personal identifiers from being placed on motor vehicles record secured for “non-permissible uses.” A web surfer can find the driver’s license status of an individual in a half dozen states, but not the address, SSN, vehicle registration, etc.
To summarize, when Maricopa County has 100 days in a row of now rain, it does not mean the entire country is suffering from a severe drought. Let’s use accurate adjectives when alerting the public to the practices of a few.

Rate this
Rated -6
252 Votes

Backup?

When you post anonymously, and then use a general phrase such as "there are numerous sources to back up this statement," the credibility of your statistics is zero. How about giving us one or two of the credible sources, so we don't have to waste our time duplicating your work?

Rate this
Rated +4
252 Votes

Backup?

Certainly Dave.
The Sourcebook to Public Record Information (1st thru 9th editions)
The Guide to Background Investigations (1st thru 8th edition)
The Public Record Research System
The Criminal Records Manual
Public Records Online
The MVR Book (19 editions)

I think the author of the article sensationalized a minor items, did not presenting all the facts to back it up, and lead the reader to draw a conclusion that this practice is widespread.

Rate this
Rated -1
223 Votes

The point of the article

The point of the article quite simply is this: the move to place public records online by county and state governments around the country over the past few years have made these documents far more accessible than ever before. The trend, according to privacy advocates, has eroded the so-called “practical obscurity” that these documents enjoyed when someone would need to actually visit the county clerk’s office in order to look at the documents.

A report released last June by the U.S. Government Accountability Office shows that the proportion of all public record keepers providing Internet access to a records index or electronic record images increased from 40% to 57% between 2004 and 2006. The GAO said its own review of record keepers showed that many were providing free or paid online access to electronic record images. “Online access to electronic record images provides potentially unlimited access to the content of records, including SSNs and other personal identifying information, unless this information has been removed by the record keeper,” the report noted. The report mentions instances where information in public records in Maricopa County and Hamilton County, Ohio were used to commit identity theft. The GAO report was focused on the federal government’s distribution of records—such as federal liens—with SSNs to state and local government record keepers. It noted that some success was being achieved in terms of redacting out SSNs from public records or at least truncating them when publishing them online. But such efforts were not enough, according to the report.

It’s not just the GAO. The privacy issues raised by the trend to post public records online are something that privacy groups, lawmakers and the media have recognized for years now. Privacy advocacy group Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) last October summarized some of the concerns in a response to a request for comment on the development of a policy for remote access to court docket information in the District of Columbia: “In the past, privacy interests in public records were protected by the rule of "practical obscurity,” EPIC said in its comments. “Now, data brokers access these public records, enter them into electronic format outside of the control of courts, and commodify them,” EPIC said. “Courts that facilitate access with technology will see more of their records captured. Likewise, courts that do not place limits on re-uses of records will see brokers distribute information about their citizens. Brokers also combine these records with other information sources, building profiles on individuals.” These lists, EPIC goes on to say, are not just used for commercial purposes, but sometimes by "predatory entities worldwide to target individuals for criminal purposes."