Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


When SCO is dead and buried

There was a time when SCO was a great company. No. Seriously. SCO Unix was a great Unix for x86 systems, and, for a brief shining moment it looked like SCO would bring together the best things of both Unix and Linux. Then, SCO's ownership got it into their heads that trying to take on IBM, Red Hat, Novell, and anyone who else who used Linux was a great plan. Ha!

As Pamela Jones, editor of Groklaw, points out, SCO appears to be heading towards Chapter 7 Bankruptcy. For those of you who don't know, Chapter 7 can be thought of as the Go to Jail card in the game Monopoly. "Go directly to Jail. Do not pass Go. Do not collect $200." Or, go out of business; do not come back; please leave the plumbing in the restrooms on your way out the door.

But now what? Novell owns Unix. There's still some good stuff left in there that isn't duplicated in Linux.

We'll never see an open-source SVRx (System V Release X) Unix though. Ransom Love, the former CEO of Caldera/SCO, had intended on combing Linux and Unix, but SCO quickly found that Unix was filled with other companies' copyrighted code. As Love said in 2003, "Indeed, at first we wanted to open-source all of Unix's code, but we quickly found that even though we owned it, it was, and still is, full of other companies copyrights."

Since Novell is a Linux company, it makes sense to me if they were to cherry-pick Unix for any still useful code and release it to Linux. However, in this economy, Novell has been cutting back on its research funds, so this might never happen.

As for OpenServer and UnixWare customers, well, good luck, guys. A handful of SCO savvy resellers and system integrators can keep these systems running for a while, but as the machines age and die, SCO's loyal users will have to switch.

Where will they go? Easy answer. The same place they've been going for years now. They'll be moving to Linux. That's because SCO's resellers are already working with Linux or getting ready to. For example, DTR Business Systems, once one of SCO's best resellers, is still offering SCO Unix products, but it's also a Red Hat partner now.

If you look at DTR's site, you'll see the company is also offering Windows products, but many SCO customers rely on vertical applications. They won't be looking for Windows answers. It easier to port a Unix programs to Linux than it is to Windows Server 2008. SCO Unix to Linux migration won't be a huge business for any system integrator or the like, but it will be a decent small niche for SCO Unix-savvy integrators and developers.

Oracle/Sun, which paid licensing fees to SCO for Unix for OpenSolaris, might have a bit of worry over the legal underpinning for Solaris, but I can't see anything coming of it. I don't see any percentage in Novell picking a fight with Oracle/Sun over the matter.

And, what did all this teach us? It taught us that there's no magic, legal bullet out there that can kill off Linux, or open source. Whether Microsoft and friends like it or not, the simple truth is that Linux and open source are as secure in the courts as any proprietary software.

They'll be more legal FUD over Linux in the months and years to come. Steve Ballmer will once more start mumbling that there's some patent rot in the heart of Linux, but it will come to nothing. Proprietary software is going to have to compete with open-source in the marketplace, not the courtroom.

What People Are Saying

*nix and its various

*nix and its various derivatives are based on 40 year old designs. Actually, all operating systems in common use today (including Windows) are based on these 40 year old designs. It should be obvious with all the security issues and development issues it's time for a rethinking of the operating systems' design and architecture. These problems are only going to be exacerbated with cloud computing if we continue to use forty year old designs in the 21st century.

Tell that to Sun. Solaris

Tell that to Sun.

Solaris has been a distributed. networked OS for probably twenty of those forty years, and is well ready for "cloud computing" - has been for some while. So is Linux. The only "OS" out there that has "security and development issues" is Winbloze, which had security issues (viruses) _before_ the commercialization of the Internet and the WWW. These issues were then severely compounded by hooking a network-unaware operating system (DoS) to the Internet. Ever since, the priority of the Monopolist has been to maintain its monopoly - nothing more. "Security is a PR problem, not a programming problem". Don't try to imagine that yer 'bloze security problems are shared by *NIX, - because they aren't.

Waiting for the day when

Waiting for the day when Microsoft comes to realize that open source is the right way to make the tech world more competitive. Lot of MS products simply died. One if was Liquid Motion back in late 90's. It was a very good app but didn't get much attention. There needs to be active and spontaneous effort from community which lacks in closed sources apps.

Focus

Tech companies that focus on producing good products usually do produce good products.

Tech companies that focus on court battles rarely produce anything worth having.

Huh?

How do you "comb" two operating systems? lol

Sorry, but could not resist. ;)

SCO

I remember a time when Caldera was a decent respectable Linux company with products that were worth using and good ideas. I bought stock in the company at that time.
Then Duhrl came in and announced the whole "we own Linux" bullsh*t. I IMMEDIATELY dumped the stock because it was quite obvious the guy had his head up his orifice.
So time goes on and eventually one of my customers running SCO on their server begins to get unhappy with their situation and service. Did I recommend they update to a newer version of SCO on a newer server class hardware?

Riiiiight......

Of course not. I took GREAT pleasure in turning them on to a new Linux server which they are very happy with.
As part of the deal I ended up with the old server. You can't imagine the amount of satisfaction it gave me to get it back to the office and stick in that SME Server disc. Can you say SCO wiped off the face of that server? I knew you could. ;)

So while SCO under Duhrl was obviously trying to pull a fast one and we hear a lot in the tech media of the involvement of the affected companies and legal strategies what you don't often hear is stories like mine where the little guys, who know better who "owns Linux", have taken every opportunity to kill SCO where it really hurts them. Their bottom line at the customer level.

Multiply me and my story by thousands and SCO's end is inevitable.

Reminds me of the time I

Reminds me of the time I dumped my Novell stock on the news of their agreement with Microsoft. ;-)

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols and SCO

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols writes pro Linux and anti SCO notes in Computerworld Blogs. His latest inspiration is titled "When SCO is dead and buried".

Vaughan-Nichols wrote among other speculations that "Novell owns Unix."

His speculation is based on a decision by Judge Dale A Kimball from 2007. The ruling is currently challenged by SCO and a decision is expected soon by the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver.

At the time of Kimball's ruling, Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols wrote a note titled "SCO Goes Down in Flames: Novell owns Unix".

Vaughan-Nichols and Groklaw's Pamela Jones took Kimball's decision as SCO's ultimate and final fate in disregard of an obvious and expected appeal.

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols is doing the same almost two years later as he speculates SCO is to be "dead and buried".

This time his partner in anti SCO efforts Pamela Jones has taken a step back and has made "one small correction". Jones wrote "I haven't said SCO is necessarily heading for Ch. 7." [ http://tinyurl.com/n2dbtu ]

Linux techno-troopers is a name given by Byte magazine to operating system fanatics in a note titled "The Sound And The Fury" and published in 1996. [ http://tinyurl.com/nxxv5h ]

Are Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols and Pamela Jones Linux techno-troopers? I invite you to judge for yourself.

Do something useful

Why don't you do something useful, Anonymous Coward, and document all the code in Linux that SCO says was stolen from Unix?

Techno-troopers

[Raising my hand] Me too! Me too! I'm PROUD to be a techno-trooper!