Why Clinton victory doesn't compute

In your last paragraph you

In your last paragraph you say much of New Hampshire uses paper ballot so Clinton's win couldn't have been voting machine fraud.

Why didn't you investigate a little further? The tally of paper ballots, excluding the machine count, gives the win to Obama.

The paper ballots also choose Ron Paul over Rudy Giuliani.

It's also interesting to note that with all the other candidates, the voting machine poll percentages match the paper ballot poll, indicating that only results for those candidates, Clinton, Obama, Paul and Giuliani were manipulated.

All the latest on voter fraud

Breaking news, voter fraud verfied in NH, for all the latest details go to www.prisonplanet.com if this was not blocked I highly recommend you read all the information.

The Truth?

The truth is that polling is meaningless. Predicting an election is less accurate than predicting the weather.

I believe that some of the

I believe that some of the media coverage and the Clintons are in bed together. The crying stunt and the amazing come from behind victory was a scam to bloster Hiliary's image. As she as said countless times, she as a lot of experience. She knows how to play the game and work the media and influence public opinion. Hiliary had NH, it is not a suprise. But they (Clintons) are trying to make it seem more than it actually is. I believe Barak Obama did very well in that state. He is accomplishing so much for someone who has "so little experience. To say it was a come from behind victory for Hiliary takes away from Obama's achievement of coming in second by only 3% from a SEASONED politican like Hiliary. It also detracts from the fact that Hiliary almost lost in NH, where she was almost assured to win. Her campaign realised Obama was a bigger threat than they originally thought after Iowa. So they had to do something and they did. So she looks great and already they are calling Obama the underdog. God I hope America is smart enough to see through the Clinton garabage. She is no better than Bush.

vote fraud

can we even call "evote fraud" a conspiracy theory anymore? i thought it was common knowledge by now. kinda like the world being round.
peace, & remember, friends dont let friends watch fox news

81 % of the votes

http://www.blackboxvoting.org/

The exact same make, model and version hacked in the Black Box Voting project in Leon County is used throughout New Hampshire, where about 45 percent of elections administrators hand count paper ballots at the polling place, with the remaining locations all using the Diebold version 1.94w optical scan machine. Because the voting machine locations tend to be urban, this represents about 81 percent of the New Hampshire voters.

And with the Republican race, I wouldn't look first at fraud in the number one position. I'd look for it in the area of repositioning candidates in the second through sixth spot.

- The delay in results is a red flag.
- The vote totals going down during the count is a red flag.
- The failure to release county results in live time, as promised in a Republican Party press release on Jan. 2, is a red flag.
- The failure to release precinct totals at all is a corrupt procedure. Note that the day before the caucuses, after much pressure, the Republicans did (belatedly) promise to release the precinct results on election night. They didn't.

In addition: I'm trying to get information on whether the public was kicked out of the room during hand counting in all locations, or just some.

I will be publishing some reports by caucus attendees in the "Front Lines" section later today.

There is absolutely no reason to consider any of the Republican caucus results to be credible.

I'm not saying they are wrong, I am saying the breakdown in checks and balances was stunning enough to call it not a magic show, but a bad magic show.

Bev Harris

Polls are rigged, election

Polls are rigged, election was rigged...

rigged rigged rigged RIGGED

And no "Diebold" machines counted something like 81% of the votes.

And there are major discrepancies across the board.

Hopefully one of the candidates who were cheated will demand a recount.

Theres already been evidence of some major tampering

The officials in Sutton have

The officials in Sutton have ADMITTED they did not report certain votes. Those of you who are still looking for a "simpler answer" are sleeping on the job. The simplest answer is the most obvious answer, and it is the one being confirmed by those who were responsible for the votes.

CERTAIN VOTES WERE NOT REPORTED

As long as intelligent people continue to bury their head in the sand, these "discrepencies" will continue. In other words, these bastards steal elections because you let them. You aren't looking for a "simpler" answer. You are looking for the most complicated answer as possible in order to reason away the cognative dissonance which occurs upon the realization that you are a slave, and your vote doesn't count.

Before you stomp your feet and throw a tantrum about "conspiracy theories" this is the confirmed statement of THOSE WHO COUNTED THE VOTES IN SUTTON, not my personal THEORY. Wake up and smell the voter fraud. What kind of person who has computer knowledge and access to the internet still believes that election fraud is a conpsiracy theory? A child, regardless of their age. Election fraud is so obvious and such the norm it has become a movie of the week. I pray to whatever god you believe in that you people grow up, because you are taking the whole country down with your ignorance.

Yes, New Hampshire uses

Yes, New Hampshire uses paper ballots. But in much of the state, those ballots are counted by machine. It would be interesting to see how the current totals compare to a hand recount.