Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Subscribe to our e-mail newsletters
For more info on a specific newsletter, click the title. Details will be displayed in a new window.
Computerworld Daily News (First Look and Wrap-Up)
Computerworld Blogs Newsletter
The Weekly Top 10
More E-Mail Newsletters 

Why did Apple hire away IBM's Mark Papermaster?

The news of this fairly slow week for Apple watchers came in the form of a lawsuit from Apple's PowerPC partner, IBM, who apparently are trying to protect some chip design IP. What are Apple's intentions with Mr. Papermaster?

IBM’s Case: Noncompete Agreement Details

The details of the IBM Noncompetition Agreement are significant. The agreement states that Papermaster agrees that he will not (within 1 year of termination) “engage in or associate with (a) any ‘Business Enterprise’ or (b) any significant competitor or major competitor of the Company…”. By “Business Enterprise” the agreement means any entity or entity that owns or controls a significant interest in any entity that engages in competition with the “business units or divisions of the Company” (IBM) in which you have worked at any time during the two year period prior to the termination. The agreement further defines “engage in” completely to include both consultant and contractor status, so even if Papermaster didn’t join Apple as an employee he would still be barred from engaging with Apple.

Papermaster's non compete contract

IBM’s case based on this Noncompetition Agreement seems to hinge on Apple being deemed:

  • a “significant competitor” to IBM
  • a “major competitor of the company” {that being IBM}
  • or an entity that engages in competition with business units or divisions of IBM

First, let's look at Mr. Papermaster's (that name doesn't get old, does it?) background.

In the late 90's Papermaster was one of the main drivers of the PowerPC chip. He likely had lots of interaction with Apple at this point as they were the PowerPC platform's biggest customer. The PowerPC 630 (or Power3) was ultimately used in IBM mainframe computers but was originally built with the intention of going in desktops - perhaps Apple's. Papermaster was one of the main architects of this processor.

Since then, he has authored many papers on chip design and is generally regarded as one of the leaders in the chip design field.

Then a few years ago, he was put in charge of IBM's blade server division. I think this point is moot because I don't think Apple is going after the blade server market. I'd frankly be surprised if they put any more resources into their Xserves or server hardware in general. Apple, the consumer company, just doesn't spend much in the way on resources on servers.


Computerworld Report
An Apple for Your Enterprise?


People have speculated that Apple may want Papermaster to help build the hardware infrastructure for Apple's cloud effort. While hardware is no doubt a key portion of the cloud puzzle, Apple's biggest weakness in this area is back-end server software.

Plus, the terms of the suit laid out above seem directly in line with chip design. Apple isn't competing with IBM in the blade field. Nor are they competing directly in the cloud computing space. But they are likely going to be competing with IBM in the chip field fairly soon.

So, let's focus on the PowerPC portion of Papermaster's resume. As I mentioned earlier, he is one of the leaders in chip design field.

PA Semi, the company Apple purchased a few months ago, was going up against IBM in selling PowerPCs (PA Semi's PWREfficient was in the running to replace the IBM G5 when Apple moved to Intel). PA Semi, as a unit of Apple, is still fulfilling PowerPC contracts for embedded systems for military and other uses.

But will the final product that Apple is working on be a PowerPC processor? Probably not. One of PA Semi's engineers let slip a few months ago that he is working on an ARM-based processor that will be in future Apple products. Steve Jobs had mentioned this earlier in an interview with the New York Times. However, Steve Jobs has been known to throw his competitors off of the trail with offhand remarks.

Also, as a commenter points out, Apple is hiring CPU engineers for high performance chips, not just for mobile devices.

So what will become of this hire? My feeling is that he will add a lot of talent to the PA Semi team and his mentoring will help bring in other talented chip engineers to Apple. That is, unless IBM blocks him.

What People Are Saying

Mac Clones

I believe that Apple is currently trying to develop their own low power processors for their consumer devices as part of bringing production in-house in order to reduce the number of product leaks that have run rampant this year alone, but I do not think that this is where they will stop.

Ever since Apple converted OS X to run on Intel, they have been kept busy trying to keep the Mac Clone market from taking fruition, and now it seems they are losing ground on this battle. With Pystar's clones and EFiX's USB dongle for installing OS X on a regular PC, Apple realizes they may lose the battle.

Being the control freaks that they are, they may very well prepare themseleves to run OS X on their own processor that cannot be duplicated by another company and where OS X could not be tweaked to run on some other processor produced outside of Apple.

This obviously would guarantee that their software/hardware marriage would stay intact and their revenues would remain predictable.

With IBM about to Layoff

With IBM about to Layoff MORE semiconductor talent, it's suprising they even took notice... I watched first had as IBM employees took their talent to both TI and Motorola to develop and manufacturer both CMP and CU technology...(btw BOTH COMPANIES PAY BETTER) Big Blue wants out of chip manufacturing, but wants to retains the Billion plus in IT revenue and patent generation...

Venturing into high-performance microprocessors?

There is a little intelligence from the Job Opportunities posted at Apple's website. There are a number of CPU Implementation Engineer positions under the Mac Hardware Engineering section. Note that these are not in the iPod Engineering section which is aimed to iPod and iPhone jobs.

If you look at the postings you will find sentences like:

... "design of a high-performance, low-power microprocessor core" ...
... "experience in high-performance microprocessor design" ...

Apple might not be making PowerPCs but it seems interested in making processors and not only for iPods and iPhones -- unless these job opportunities were posted in the wrong section due to a clerical error.

Non-compete

Non-competes cannot be enforced in California. Trade secrets must still be kept secret though.

the lawsuit was filed in New

the lawsuit was filed in New York, where IBM is located

Must Eat

In most no-compete issues, the courts have ruled in favor of the party attempting to leave.

Why? Because they have to be able to eat.

Are they expected to throw away their professional lives? No.

It's one thing if they put everything related to their original employer into a wheelbarrow and ran as fast as they could.

It's impossible for them to walk into a new employer and not carry something over, even if it's just their expertise in a subject.

Except in a small number of cases, it's not as if notes can be kept - before as well as after - and show a direct correlation.

Creativity is *not* a linear process.

Just because they jointly

Just because they jointly own IP, and were once allies, does NOT mean they cannot be competitors today. Potentially (but unlikely), IBM is not concerned about Apple's business or plans in any current business area. It could be a problem with PA semi's products. Those didn't just vanish when Apple bought them.

I, too, think this is about augmenting PA Semi, for future ARM derivatives.

Don't forget. The PPC was and is a far more successful embedded processor than it ever was a desktop processor. That was both an asset (low cost, and low power), and part of the problem (long, long, long update cycles compared to desktop CPUs) in the AIM era. The needs of a desktop processor are very different than an embedded device or game console... Add military requirements, and the technologies diverge further.

IBM seems to be after Motorola's (now known as Freescale) customers, and they don't want Apple making waves. Long term, there could be some overlap with Apple's servers, but not much.

Why did he leave IBM?

The major question for me is why was he happy to leave IBM?

Was he unhappy with his job, passed over for promotion, paid below competitive rates? For a key person to leave to go to another company there needs to be a willingness to leave and this might be where IBM failed.

As for his future work at Apple, Apple has a very large amount of cash and can expand their R&D at a time when other computer companies are contracting theirs. I think Steve Jobs is continually looking 3 to 5 years down the road and there may well be plans that excite talented staff in other companies. But that talent still needs to be willing to leave.

Why did he take so long to leave IBM?

A better question would be why a hardware engineer would want to stay at IBM. The company is in the process of turning itself from a computer company to a services company. They dumped their PC line, they wouldn't make the investments to keep the PPC competitive with Intel and AMD, they're losing ground in the server business to HP and generic Linux boxes...

I think anyone interested in computer hardware these days, who still wants to invent new technologies would be flocking to Apple.

PowerPC ARM

I think you've made a good point but perhaps this is just a random hire for building out Apple's new chips. Just because his past is in PowerPC doesn't mean that Apple is going back to making PowerPCs.

Also, what are there chances of there being some sort of Frankensteined ARM-PowerPC hybrid computer