Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Why Microsoft is running scared of Linux

Microsoft is frightened. Even Ballmer is telling users that they can skip Vista, which tells you everything you need to know about Vista's failure. In the past, Microsoft wouldn't have sweated this kind of flop. "What can users do?" they'd say. "Move to Linux or Macs? Ha!" That was then. This is now.

Today, major PC vendors are selling netbooks like hotcakes on a cold Vermont morning and three out of ten of those are running Linux. As my comrade in arms, Preston Gralla observes, "Microsoft isn't just worried about ceding 30 percent of the netbook market to Linux. It's also worried that if people get used to Linux on netbooks, they'll consider buying Linux on desktop PCs. Here's what Dickie Chang, an analyst at research firm IDC in Taipei, told Bloomberg about that: 'It's a real threat to Microsoft. It gives users a chance to see and try something new, showing them there is an alternative.'"

Exactly, and that's why Microsoft is rushing out Windows 7, which is a stripped down Vista SP2, as fast as they can and jerking out features so it will run on netbooks with minimal hardware. Gralla thinks Windows 7 will kill Linux on the netbook, I don't see that.

For all the mistaken excitement about Windows 7, the earliest anyone is going to see Windows 7 is the 2009 holiday season. That's eternity in Linux terms. Linux is already better than Vista and the equal to Microsoft's best desktop operating system, Windows XP SP 3. By the time Windows 7 appears, Fedora, openSUSE and Ubuntu will have all gone through at least two more generations of upgrades.

Windows is a slow dinosaur competing with the fast-moving Linux mammals. It's not a race I expect Windows to win.

Linux is already more stable, more secure, vastly faster boot times, and it's far less expensive than Windows. With efforts afoot to make desktop Linux even more new user friendly and its much faster evolution, I'm not worried about Windows 7 sweeping Linux off the desktop. But, I can certainly see why Microsoft would worry about Linux gaining a substantial, say 30%, of the desktop market or even more if Windows 7 isn't a rip-roaring success.

The days when Microsoft ruled the desktop are numbered and Windows 7 is Microsoft's frantic attempt to forestall the inevitable.

What People Are Saying

The Long Game

Hi Marcus,

You have expressed my own feelings about the computing world so eloquently! Thank you.

I will never again put up with Microsoft's repeated extortion. Their behaviour as a corporate citizen is deplorable. Usually, this is a reflection of a company's founder and managers.

Their constant empty-my-wallet upgrade cycle, anti-competitive rotten tricks and arrogance are digging their own sewer pit of hell. Fall in Microsoft. I'm mature enough not to laugh, but I can't promise not to snigger.

Ubuntu User

The long game


I am 43 years old.
I have maybe fourty more years of computer use ahead of me before my eyes, bladder, kidneys and heart fail. My choice about personal computing is this;
Do I invest the remainder of my time in this mortal coil learning the ins and outs of a closed source proprietry operating system and adjunctive software from a set of companies that regularly shaft me, or do I invest that time and learning into developing a degree of skill in a free and open source computing environment? I am no newbie and I am technically highly competent, so I should be able to do either.
I invested sixteen years into learning M$ Do$, Window$ and Microsoft productivity products from Office to Publisher. I'm a teacher, so I generate thousands of documents every year. Over Sixteen years of teaching I have written the equivalent of five text books and two novels of support materials. At every upgrade I got shafted by M$ because my backups were incompatible with the latest new OS right from DOS3 to Vista. Vista even failed to provide a utility to recognise my DLT tape drive, so my fastidiously generated backup sets were useless until I removed Vista and replaced XP. All my previous work was incompatible in one way or another with the new software and OS. All this extra stress so that Richmond can leverage more licence fees. To say that I am aggrieved is an understatement.
I am thouroughly sick of being manipulated by Microsoft as a cash cow having to cough up more of my hard earned cash. I have at last got my Ubuntu box running faster and safer than I have ever been able to get from a Microsoft OS. My Nikon camera works. My Canon video camera works, admitedly after changing a couple of permissions and doing about two hours research. My printer and scanner all work, just as well as in MS.
I downloaded the Windows 7 release candidate. In comparison to my Ubuntu setup, MS windows 7 is less secure, less powerful and less configurable.
When I learned that MS would pull the same versioning stunt with W7 as they did with Vista, that was the final straw. I removed the windows 7 RC and deleted the 32 and 64 bit isos from my hard disk. Microsoft will never receive another penny from me.
So my decision is easy. I persuaded my wife to let me put Linux on her machine. She's delighted. By the way, I have two small children who use ubuntu's educational toys every day and love Tux.
So ultimately Linux and Free and Open Source will crush Microsoft because folks like me will refuse to have it in their homes and also will teach our children about Free and Open Source computing. I'd just like to be around when M$ get paid back for years of cynical manipulation of the small joes like me.

Microsoft running scared??? Of Linux?

It's not.

Microsoft's SEC Quarterly Reports...

Microsoft's SEC Quarterly Reports... Sworn to, along with Court Testimony dating back to 2005, speak loudly of the fears of executives at MS that their surveys prove Linux is THE challenge they must meet!

Now, with Microsoft itself endorsing Linux, I see the
true reality. MS runs 15,000 Linux servers, for MSN.com and all web update servers; 400 Aruba Linux firewall routers on the Corporate network...

Scared, but, practical, when they can't eat their own dog food!

Of a more practical nature: I advise you get Linux Mint 7 from http://linuxmint.com

Linux Mint 8, 'Helena', is now released, but,
I wait about 2-6 months after a new release, to run it on my production machines.

Linux is a true parallel processing multi-user/tasking/process concurrent processing system, that naturally blows away that Microsoft consecutive (baby step) serial processing (toy - game) OS!

I am converting 10-20 Microsoft users' computers, each week, saving each user the $180 "re-install windows" tax charged by PC shops to "fix" their crashed Windows systems!

Microsoft running scared??? Of Linux?

It's not.

Whats a Linux? In 6 years of

Whats a Linux?
In 6 years of dealing with business computers I never once saw anything other than Windows and the occasional Mac.
Not once.
I don't even know what Linux looks like.
I don't know a soul on this planet (or any other planet) that uses Linux yet "Microsoft is running scared of Linux".
Hahahahahahahahaha.....................................................................whew.

Are you joking?

Obviously you've never dealt with REAL business computers. Never seen Linux? Some form of Linux runs on just about everything you see. Its everywhere from portable devices to kiosks...from NASA to Google...from cell phones to the space shuttle. Do you think that warehouse full of servers at Google is running Windows? Do you think our U.S. space program relies on the pretty pictures in Vista? Surely you jest. A computer is a tool and that's exactly what you have with Linux. Computers are made to crunch numbers and sort information. Windows is made to take your money and show you some pretty pictures. Windows is fine if you just want to surf the net...but I recommend you install Firefox first.....

Apache

I guess they don't let you into the server room, I wouldn't.

Server room? I wouldn't let

Server room? I wouldn't let this fool near the copier!

linux is an OS kernel that

linux is an OS kernel that every year (for past 15 years) has been claiming to replace windows. It has less than 1% market share and it is feature incomplete (when used with GNU tools) when it comes to desktop usage. yet its fanboies claim that the features are not incomplete, but infact that are FEATURES and give you FREEDOM).
When Windows get virus/worm due to openoffice, Linux users blame M$ but when same happens on linux system, they blam openoffice.
:)