Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Preston Gralla's picture
Preston Gralla

Seeing Through Windows

Why Microsoft is serious about Open Source

Microsoft held out the peace pipe to the Open Source community today when the company announced that is offering free access to its most important APIs and formerly proprietary protocols, and will offer more support for open standards. Why has Microsoft seen the light? I have a one-word answer: Google.

As Computerworld reports, Microsoft is taking some very significant steps to support open standards, and to improve its relationship with the Open Source community, which has often been rocky.

The company will publish APIs and communications protocols for its most important, high volume products, including Windows Vista (including the .NET Framework), Windows Server 2008, SQL Server 2008, Office 2007, Exchange Server 2007, and Office SharePoint Server 2007 -- and future versions of the products. In addition, says Computerworld, Microsoft "won't require third party developers to buy licenses or pay royalty fees in order to access this information."

There's a lot more for the Open Source community as well, including supporting open standards, and an Open Source interoperability initiative, meant to improve Microsoft's relationship with the Open Source community. Microsoft, in fact, has been doing this for some time, with its Open Source labs, and Port 25 site, devoted to Microsoft work on Open Source.

Why has Microsoft suddenly gotten religion? The company has finally recognized that it can't succeed as an island, no matter how big that island may be.

Google's support of open standards have served Google well, and there's a sizable ecosystem of sites and developers working with Google. More important, it is becoming increasingly true that the Internet has become, in essence, an operating system, with applications in the form of Web sites built on top of it. That will become only more so in the future. And the starting point for just about everyone is Google, not any site run by Microsoft. Unless Microsoft acts, it could become an also-ran to the search giant.

In order to remain relevant, Microsoft needs to become open, and allow applications to be hooked more easily its products. Because Microsoft has been closed, there hasn't been nearly as enthusiastic developer community devoted to it as to various Open Source technologies. In the long run, enthusiasm pays off, because it means innovation.

No matter the reason, though, Microsoft's move today is all to the good --- good for users, good for developers, and ultimately good for Microsoft as well.

What People Are Saying

Who cares?

MS seems to be intent on being the IBM of its era including its mistakes. They built a fortress and kept the infidel out. Now they're locked in. No one writing Java is going to convert to .Net. No one writing for MySQL is going to convert to SQL Svr. No one doing Linux development is going to convert to Windows. That train has left. The O/S is plumbing, and when Google gets around to delivering working Office apps that are compatible even remotely with Excel it's OVER.

BS

Microsoft isn't interested in Open Source. Open Standards, sure - they want all developers writing apps that work with their stuff. And competing with Google, yeah, for sure. But Open Standards is not the same as Open Source.

Specifically, you can bet your little booties that no matter how "free" the MS APIs are in dollars, they will never be "FREE" as freedom to modify them however you want. Moreover, I'd lay money on the licensing for the APIs (and by extension, whatever is written with them) being incompatible with any version of the GPL.

For Microsoft, Free ($$) software is marketing. FREE (freedom) software is anathema - it'll never happen with any real earnest.

Microsoft and Open Source

Reading Ballmer's comments over several years I see that he talks out of both sides of his mouth and his --- as well. We'll have to wait and see if Microsoft is really serious or if it's just another mood swing.