Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Troy Brumley's picture
Troy Brumley

As A Programmer

Why Android will not beat the iPhone

As a programmer, you would think I'd buy into the "Android will dethrone the iPhone" meme, but I don't. I've read about the impending success of Android on the web, heard about it from coworkers who regard Steve Jobs and Apple with the same disdain that some Linux and Mac fans have for Bill Gates and Microsoft, and talked about it with some people on the Smalltalk language IRC channel.

This is another "betamax versus VHS" debate.

Google has done good things with its Android platform, but it doesn't have what it takes to beat the iPhone.

There are two main reasons why the Android won't win the battle for smartphone supremacy against the iPhone, and the enhancements to the iPhone announced this week at Apple's WWDC don't enter into this analysis.

Design

Compare an Android based G1 to the iPhone. The iPhone is pleasing to the eye, feels better in the hand, and makes the G1 look cheap and brick like. Consumers give style equal or greater weight than functionality when making their purchase decisions. The iPhone has nothing to fear from Android based phones until someone is making phones that are as pleasing to look at as they are functional.

Don't misunderstand me, I think Android is a great platform. I was impressed with Android's architecture as presented by Stefan Kyntchev in his Introduction to Programming on the Android Platform. Kyntchev is the creator of BeyondPod, an RSS feed reader and podcast manager for Windows Mobile, which he has ported to the Android platform. He clearly understands working on mobile platforms and I expect to hear about a Pre port of BeyondPod in a few months.

But consumer and industrial design beat platform architecture.

Competition

The Palm Pre may make Palm into a real player in the smartphone market. It's another sharp looking smartphone--Gizmodo reports that the Pre is sharp enough to cut cheese.

If you read either Gizmodo's list of ten things you should know about the Pre or Walt Mossberg's review of the Pre, you will find that the Pre is a consumer ready competitor to the iPhone. Mossberg's biggest issue with the Pre centered around the lack of available apps in Palm's App Catalog.

Two important features that might make up for the limited App Catalog are the Pre's ability to run classic Palm applications and its support for Mac software, especially iTunes and iCal. The Blackberry experience for a Mac user is suboptimal at best.

The Pre may turn out to be a serious contender versus the iPhone, but it will definitely draw potential customers away from the G1 and other Android phones based on its hardware design.

Odd Android out?

With the iPhone and the Pre competing for the consumer market (with plans to move into the enterprise), and the Blackberry firmly established in the enterprise, Android based smartphones will be playing catch-up.

Troy Brumley develops software for Cincom Systems, Inc.. He currently works with Microsoft's .NET Framework, but the Apple Mac is his platform of choice.

What People Are Saying

Reply

Android phones will be more complex.iPhone's platform is off limits and Microsoft allows very limited interaction with its platform.The iPhone looks cool and it's easy to use, and that's all that really matters to 95% of the population.Google on the other hand does not have a set agenda and this means that you can expect to see cutting edge technology in Android based phones much faster.

Are you joking?

I have a motorola droid and I had an iphone and I prefer my motorola droid over iphone here is why

1. It has a real keyboard
2. I can customize it, wallapers, etc. more than I could ever do it with my iphone.
3. The real time free turn by turn of google maps really rocks. Also, I have many google accounts such as gmail, gtalk, analytic, and etc that work greatly with android OS.
4. Application variety competes with apple.
5. Android is more open. As a techi, I can appreciate Android alot more than any apple products ever. Apple's exclusive deals and their closed system sickens me.

this guy is stupid. not only

this guy is stupid. not only are the iphone and android two different things, but it seems as if hes never even used the android platform. great writing, not.

p.s. android will destroy the iphone in market share within 5 years.

Today we blog about the insecurities I feel about my phone?!?

Well.. I'll give you this; running a stick across the bars that keep the "brand loyal" prisoner is a proven method of making them bark.

Yeah the ergonomics of the G1 aren't going to convince the people that like to admire the contents of their pocket to switch. I'm sorry to say you aren't the first to point that out.

But with Android you can actually ask the question.. would you prefer the android OS on your iPhone... were you given the choice? Its a choice Google will give you.. but Apple probably won't... which is why I don't dig Apple. And most iPhone users would probably say no. But if you ask the average WinMo user... would you like to throw away your stylus and browser from 2001 if you could... the answer is going to be different.

And that is why the assumption that Android targets Apple's market share is false.. and bad.. and misleading. Android is an OS. the iPhone is a handset. Just a very popular handset.

A quick rundown of World smarty-phone OS market share - Q4 2008

Symbian - 47%
Blackberry - 20%
WinMo - 12%
iPhone - 10%
Linux - 9%

Notice anything?

a more interesting trend line to watch is growth of share

Robert, I am aware of those stats, but more important are growth trends. From my Android Programming Overview post on another blog, here is a note about trendlines:

"If you look at new unit sales, Apple is in 3rd or 4th place but climbing rapidly, with year to year growth is over 100% in all metrics. If you just look at mobile web browser usage, Apple and Android are the top two with the next most frequent platform (I think it was RIM) a distant third"

Stefan Kyntchev sourced that data, but I don't have the link handy. I found this Overview of Gartner Smartphone Sales Trends on Mac Daily News, see the year over year growth percentage. It isn't clear to me if Android is lumped into "other" or "Linux" in the various tables in the article. Android may have a breakout year in 2009 over 2008. We'll know more as the year progresses.

An excerpt of Table 3 from the sales trends article:

Worldwide: Smartphone Sales to End Users by Operating System, growth 4Q07-4Q08(%)

Symbian -21.6
RIM 84.9
WinMo 7.8
Mac OS X 111.6
Linux 19.4
Palm OS -27.3
Other 6.2

Note that Symbian is showing negative growth from 2007 to 2008.

Troy Brumley develops software for Cincom Systems, Inc. His personal blog is A Suitably Innocuous Blog, and he also micro-blogs on Twitter @Troi.

Your analogy is flawed the iPhone is Betamax

I'm not going to go into the platform device debate. Others already have.

But your VHS Betamax analogy is intrinsically flawed. Betamax failed despite being a superior format because it was locked into one vendor (Sony).

The iPhone is produced by one vendor, controlled by one vendor and one vendor has a stranglehold on it's app market.

The Android platform may be spearheaded by one vendor, but anyone can make an android device (Note I don't say phone) which means in the long term there will be wider choice on the platform.

I for example didn't buy an iPhone initially because I like having a tactile keyboard, there are Android devices coming out with and without key boards. Want a device with smaller form factor? there is one those comign out too.

The iPhone is locked into the one model apple happens to be selling at the moment. And while apple will always have it's group of people who religiusly buy anything they stick an apple logo on, I think Android will do quite well.

Anyway the point is if we take your VHS Betamax Analogy seriously then the iPhone is Betamax and Android is VHS. (it's not as simple as that as there are other contenders in the market, but if you want to simplify it to that then I can only operate withing the parameters you supply)

I used to have a betamax, I was an apple fan boy. I migrated to VHS and I migrated to linux/windows, because I didn't have to pay a premium for having a logo on my deveces.

Wow, you can predict the

Wow, you can predict the future. :)
No, serious Android is a platform and the iPhone is a device. Platform and device is not the same!
Android can already run on walkmans, phones, netbooks etc. And the list will grow!

Let's wait and see.

I can not understand you

I can not understand you people why are you so hung up on the G1?? Is it really too much to ask to broaden your horizon? Fair enough you haven't taken the new features just announced at Apple's WWDC into account but what you also haven't done is looked at the whole picture with Android. Ever heard of the HTC Magic? Style wise it beats the iPhone and software wise, OK it doesn't scroll as smooth as the iPhone, but other than that it does everything that the iPhone (even 3.0) does and even more plus it looks good, and lets not start talking about the Samsung i7500 as it might make you look even more stupid. I for one think the iPhone looks like a bar of soap, but I know the iPhone has its place, just like webOS or WinMo.

I really hope you stop

I really hope you stop writing, broadcasting this kind of stupid is dangerous.

As a programmer...you must not want to make money.

Any developer with common sense would be looking to target Android, WebOs and the IPhone all together. However if you are limited in time and resources then the obvious bet would be Android. Plain and simple. Apple cannot sell more IPhones than Android devices in the long run (hell...the short run either). You're stuck on the G1 like so many other fools while 18-20 more devices are nearing launch. Thats going to be a huge market for applications. Only an idiot would overlook it. And thats not counting the netbooks, home phones, and the just announced Sony Walkman. Once again...only and idiot...

Trying to figure out which one will win is a complete waste of time. They are all pretty much here to stay for some time to come so it would make sense to make money off all of them.