Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Don Tennant's picture
Don Tennant

Stirring IT Up

Why the race issue warrants discussion

I received an e-mail this afternoon from a reader who wrote to inform me that he had cancelled his print subscription because of my interview in this week's issue with Earl Pace, founder of Black Data Processing Associates.

The reader expressed the view that the interview doesn't belong in a technology publication, and that intrigued me. The inference is that this publication shouldn't cover non-technology issues relating to what people deal with in the IT workplace. Are gender- and age-related issues out of bounds, too? The fact is, covering such issues has been Computerworld's mandate since its inception more than four decades ago.

Below is the full text of his e-mail string, which includes an e-mail he sent me in December following a column I wrote about how the race issue is still beset by destructive labels. My position is that it's exactly this sort of rant that makes it so evident that the race issue in particular needs to be discussed rather than swept under the rug. And continue to be discussed it will.

***

From: Schumacher, Peter A.

Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 1:54 PM

To: 'don_tennant@computerworld.com'

Subject:

Mr. Tennant,

After reading the Earl Pace interview (or parts of it), I called to cancel my subscription.

Those evil white people (/sarcasm) holding everyone back, like President Obama, black CEOs, and the U.S. Attny. General, who would call me a 'race coward'.

I don't think this belongs in a technology publication. 

Regards,

Peter Schumacher

Area Missile Systems Engineering

Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory

[phone numbers and e-mail address provided]

ps. I read the Time magazine ad pages were off 47.5% (ouch! haha) which is pretty close to the percent of people who voted for McCain. Liberal bias like at Time can drive away subscribers who don't like their opinions vilified and misrepresented.

______________________________

From: Schumacher, Peter A.

Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2008 10:47 AM

To: 'don_tennant@computerworld.com'

Subject:

Mr. Tennant,

Please just stop with the racial discussion or cancel my subscription. You libs just can't stop putting down white people, "another white educator walked up to him and in essence said...". So you think whites are unrepentant racists?

Well Mr. "I'm so enlightened", hear this! In 1983 I was rejected from Brown, Williams, Stanford, Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Berkley, and wait-listed by Hopkins and Cornell. I had 1280 SATs (old days before scores adjusted), was a freshman varsity letterman in multiple sports, 3.55 gpa, top 5% of Howard County Maryland public high school class (one of best public schools in country), served as Student Rep. to the County Board of Education in my senior year and worked as a computer tech part time.

The black girl in my class got scholarships to most of those schools even though her SATs were 1000ish and GPA 3.0.  (She went to Berkley in end). She grew up in upper middle class Columbia, MD. Your liberal affirmative action created some deep anger in me, as I had already sold my slaves and didn't feel that I should still be punished by overt racial and gender discrimination on my college admissions.

So, the liberal solution of coddling minorities with racial preferences could only come from one underlying philosophy 1) they are too dumb to compete head to head or 2) the racist white man keeps them down. Either premise is false and ignorant. It is time to move on. In case you didn't notice a black man was elected President of the U.S. (His name is Barack Obama). Although I didn't vote for him, it is perhaps noteworthy.

But, hey, let's rake up old hard feelings and waste a day talking instead of fixing computers. I'm sure you will solve the race issue with this discussion!

If you were really brave, you wouldn't just blame whitey for the problems of the black community. But, that is what libs do!  Racists attitudes die hard I see.

Regards,

Peter Schumacher

***

What People Are Saying

Talking is a Start

Mr. Price is correct that differences due to race still exist. I think we can accept that idea without treating it as a recrimination or demand for redress. We can't deal with the difference until we admit that it is present and start to talk about it.

Yes, a computer business journal is a place to talk about it. Computerworld has been my mainstay for industry news for over two decades, and I have visited the website since its earliest days. I read it because it covers good ideas as well as good products. I believe that the first way to make computers do more for humans is to learn more about talking with humans.

btw Mr. Tennant - did you know that the SOA event you moderated here in St. Louis last year was held in what Langston Hughes called 'the gateway to Jim Crow Country?'

Yes, let's talk racism...

Many moons ago I was elected to the board of the local chapter of the now-defunct Data Processing Management Association (DPMA) as the vice-president of membership.
Being the young idealist I wondered to myself how we could have all these wonderful, professional people as part of our DPMA organization but not a black person among them. I set about to correct this injustice for I knew there were many black people in the data processing field - many of them employed in the shop where I worked. I knew if I talked to them they would be thrilled to join, or at least go to a local chapter meeting. Wow, was I wrong. Not one person was interested. Nobody even wanted to discuss it.
I was lost as to the reason why when one of the people informed me that there was a "BDPA", Black Data Processing Association, that they belonged to and had no interest in joining the DPMA. Needless to say I was stunned at this revelation and gave up any of my utopian hope of integrating our local chapter.
As long as there are organizations like the BDPA we will never get around the racism curve.

Sorry, not Mr. Price, Mr.

Sorry, not Mr. Price, Mr. Earl A. Pace, Jr. Must be late Friday afternoon.

Data Doesn't Know Your Race

After nearly half a century of Affirmative Action that the "melanin enhanced" feel they aren't making it in the workplace can't be a shortcoming of the workplace. Especially in the tech business.

With 25 years in, I cannot recall a "White's Only" trade event anywhere in the world. I've never seen anyone stopped at the door (for any reason) nor have I as vendor ever refused to present my products to anyone regardless of race, gender or sexual preference. During that time I had the pleasure of working with many blacks, indians, asians, latinos .. oh, and women .. in all manner of roles and levels of responsibilities. The tech industry is an order of magnitude more open and accepting than any other.

America has bent over backwards to afford non-whites a leg up. The tech business above all is interested only in your capacity and ability. A discussion of non-whites choosing to segregate themselves and slobber in self-victimization does not belong in a technology publication. This blathering doesn't help the industry or the country move forward.

Data doesn't know your race, gender, sex or creed. Only how expertly you manage it. Get over your race, get over yourself and concentrate on the work.

The Signs Don't Use Words

Mark: There is an article in Wikipedia on the topic 'Institutional Racism' that you might want to look at. Racism is not as binary as the presence or absence of a rule on a sign might lead you to think.

you're right on one thing

"Racists attitudes die hard I see". Yes, certainly seems that they do. Colleges don't select students only on test scores and race. Maybe her essay was better. Maybe she was more engaging in her interview. Maybe the colleges thought her perspective would add a different flavor to class discussions because of her personality, not her level of pigment. And if you're still bitter about being picked over a classmate 26 years ago, you need to see a therapist, although I'd say if you made it to Johns Hopkins, you're not doing too bad for yourself.

Don--I agree. America may get to a point where we focus on an individual's person and not their appearance, but that time is certainly not now.

Maybe she had better dental

Maybe she had better dental work or a cute nose or a "better essay". Are you kidding me! We know why she got in! To quote TH Huxley "The foundations of morality are to have done with lying". Stop pretending that people who get 1000 on their SAT scores and have a 3.0 average are of the same ability as people who score much higher. Little people in the NBA anyone!