Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Preston Gralla's picture
Preston Gralla

Seeing Through Windows

Will Bing bury Microsoft?

Microsoft still suffers from Google envy: Steve Ballmer appears ready to make a bet of up to $11 billion that Microsoft's new search engine Bing can overtake its Internet competitor. At best, the bet is a long shot, and throwing away that amount of money could well do Microsoft irreparable harm. 

Reuters reports that Ballmer said Microsoft is willing to invest from 5 to 10 percent of its operating income over the next five years in Bing. Here's what he said, according to Reuters:

"Our shareholders, I told them we were willing to spend 5 to 10 percent of operating income for up to five years in this business, and we feel like we can get an economic return."

"We invested in Xbox for years and now it generates nice economic returns for us."

But the Xbox is one thing, and the Internet is something else entirely. Microsoft certainly didn't invest up to 10 percent of its income over five years in the gaming system, and it also didn't have a dominant competitor like Google to contend with.

According to Nicholas Carlson of the Silicon Valley Insider, Microsoft's investment would come to between $5.5 and $11 billion --- not chump change, even for a software giant like Microsoft that has plenty of cash on hand.

In fact, the company has already spent billions on its Internet business, and has yet to see any return on it. Henry Blodget of the Silicon Valley Insider says that Microsoft has already invested $8 billion in its Internet businesses, "and that investment has yet to generate a single dollar of return."

By investing up to $11 billion of company money in search over the next five years, Microsoft may starve other efforts that could pay more sure benefits. And it's not just money that's at stake --- it's company mindshare and resources as well. Then there are the opportunity costs --- opportunities the company misses because it's so focused on throwing away money on search.

Ballmer is hyper-competitive, but this is one instance where that trait is hurting Microsoft. He should just admit that he's lost the search battle to Google, and move on. There are plenty of other tech opportunities out there, but Microsoft may miss them because of its misguided attempt to beat Google.

What People Are Saying

bing bong!

All this Bing chatter is making me a little crazy. Too much hype! I like a search enging that give me the results I'm looking for. I use www.dogreatgood.com to get the results and as an added bonus the donate to pet rescue charities based on people searching.

DogEatGood.com?

For all your canine needs.

That's exactly the kind of

That's exactly the kind of hubris that might bury Microsoft as your article so eloquently points out!

Instead of getting back to what they're good at - (re)desgining a brand new OS, shedding their Windows legacy in liue of Singularity, and making a kick-ass app suite like Office even better, they try to compete against Google, who's already ahead of the curve in the online search game.

MS has yet to rediscover its niche as a software vendor... They had it for a long time, and then lost it. Now getting it back again is a bitch, especially if you've got your mouth biting into too many pies....

Why bother making Office even better ?

You're all going to buy the one they offer no matter how crappy it might be (users are familiar, more functionality, blah, blah, etc.)

microsoft one mistake after another

I am not sure who in the world thinks this blog is right ... remember the "mojave experiment" - face it vista sucked ... windows 7 will do no better ... microsoft seems to be chasing someone else's dreams .. it has ditched so many potential great investments ( windows mobile, windows server, SQL server ) and is chasing crap with the-market-doesnt-care kind of OS upgrades and who-gives-a-damn search engine ( aka bing ) ... i really feel bad for microsoft ... good luck MSFT. Can we get Gates back on the driver seat ..

The "who-gives-a-damn search

The "who-gives-a-damn search engine" (as you call it) is only gaining more and more popular each. Just because your anit-MSFT doesn't mean Bing is a bad search engine.

A matter of fact it's algorithm is superior to Google's. And it has Google taken notice!

Few points I'd like to raise here

First, it is "its algorithm" instead of "it's algorithm" or so they say since English was never my native language.
Second, it's (note the apostrophe) your opinion that the algorithm is better. My experience so far was not so great (searching for a MSSQL error message worked better in Google).
Third, of course its (no apostrophe here) popularity has nothing to do with the fact Microsoft tries to force as many users as they possible can to use it (like for instance when you search their tech support knowledge base).

It's....

Nice. ;-)

You need to check more current stats

"The "who-gives-a-damn search engine" (as you call it) is only gaining more and more popular each"

I am not saying that it will not get higher stats over time, but Bing's statistics went right back to where windows live search's stats were within a week after launch and the media campaign was over.

The reason that Bing hit the

The reason that Bing hit the same stats as Live Search is because if you use either one you get Bing.

And yes they do make it difficult NOT to use Bing and IE. It takes several confusing steps to be able to get what you want as a search engine, and IE8 is the worst browser on the market. The more microsquash tries to improve their products the worse they get.