Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Windows 7 application limit opens door for Android

We all know that Google Android netbook devices will be hitting the streets in the coming months. They are going to be running on really inexpensive ARM-based hardware and be getting an easy, unified interface, care of Google.

But how are these devices going to compete with Microsoft? Everyone in the world is familiar with the Microsoft interface and just about every application runs on Windows. It is going to be hard to topple something so ingrained in society.

Enter the recession economy. Google is going to compete on price. They are going to revolutionize the computer like they revolutionized Email - by making it (almost) free.

Their netbooks are going to cost about half to two thirds of what a normal Intel Atom-based machine will cost in hardware terms. And that is before the operating system is figured in. Microsoft is currently selling its seven year old Windows XP on most netbook computers. According to the Wall Street Journal, they only receive about $15 per license for these and it is hurting their bottom line in a big way.  They are doing this to stave off the broad adoption of Linux on Nebooks.

Microsoft can't afford to keep their prices this low for long. Instead of raising the price for the new Windows 7, they are experimenting with a Windows 7 starter edition which only allows three concurrent applications to be running at the same time. They are hoping that this will get their OS in the door (and kill Linux before it starts), and spur an up-sell as the users get frustrated by the three application limit.

I can't think of a way to lose market share quicker. 

Microsoft doesn't have much of a choice, however. If Windows OS is now only worth $15/machine, the value of Microsoft just plummeted. They'll need to make more on Windows 7 licenses.

This is exactly what Google needs to start getting a foothold in the netbook market. Even the idea of this application limitation will make some people go elsewhere.

That price advantage will have other benefits. The current $100 Netbook with a plan will turn into free netbooks with plans when you apply the Google discount. TMobile in the US would be a good bet on the carrier. They proudly carry Google's G1 Android phone currently and it wouldn't be hard to see them follow with a netbook.

But this backdrop will only get Google in the door. They have to prove their Android OS is up to par with the other operating systems out there. It will have to be secure, quick and most importantly, easy to use. 

Like Gmail.

This should be exciting to watch.

 

What People Are Saying

They have to prove their

They have to prove their Android OS is up to par with the other operating systems out there. It will have to be secure, quick and most importantly, easy to use.
cialis effects
generic cialis
cialis buy

MS has officially removed

MS has officially removed the 3-app limit. Sorry if this is repeated I didn't read all the previous comments.

Cant be possible

Microsoft will lose the windows 7 market before launching it cause the users will try and throw away windows 7.

Windows 7 would need much much more system requirements that windows vista like ram and disk space. It will be far more costly to buy a windows 7 for $15 + the computer with the lowest system requirements needed for windows 7 than a $150 android netbook.

Are you serious?

The System requirements for Windows 7 are listed as the same as Vista. And since I've been using it, I find that the minimum requirements and total resources used are actually much lower than Vista. Maybe you should spend time on the internet researching things you really need, like English lessons?

Do not be rude.

Do not be rude.

understanding MS fans

The #1 use of most PC's these days is running a web browser #2 sending mail.

The average user wouldn't know Ubuntu with KDE 4.0 from Windows 7.

Go On give try it put a normal user on an Ubuntu machine and tell him/her it's Windows 7. Put an MS Windows picture as the desktop background screen and let them go to the Firefox browser that they may have already been using.

The silly(very silly) comment about lots of $$ spent training is laughable as I just spent the last 6 months organizing training for thousands of employees for MS Vista. Now They will all have to be trained for Windows 7.

The core applications that are used are web based and Firefox is the company standard browser.

The ONLY reason for using MS seems to be, "you have no choice"

I have 30,000 people sitting answering phones and taking orders for various companies, everything from auto parts to cosmetics. They all log into the same browser based setup and have no other access to anything else on these machines.Vista was a nightmare as it changes some basic things that really we did not want changed. Paying for thousands of licenses(not to mention anti-virus etc) makes no business sense.

Our next "upgrade" will probably be to a Linux based system.

I could care less about what you use at home, the current "fad" be it .NET or some other proprietary system designed to increase MS revenue, what we need to make money, what works for our systems our bottom line, thats what matters.

calm down ms fans

He isn't saying that $15 is expensive, he's saying that ms can't afford to keep that price for long. MP3's and Movies play fine on all major linux distros and will work fine on Android laptops, in fact with a slimmer OS you will have a lot more system resources to dedicate to playing said media. The real difference is that Android will give the people what they want and not what MS thinks they want, app stores like in the iphone got their start from package managers in linux. I'm a red blooded capitalist and I'd love to see Microsoft do good, but by producing a better product not squashing competitors. I support a broad range of companies that use Ubuntu and much of their staff has a very low computer knowledge there is no for expensive retraining as long as your IT staff has half a brain.

It is well to do good.

I have seen Microsoft do well much more than I've seen Microsoft do good. I suppose I've seen them do some good, but more often than not, they do not do good. However, they most often do well. In fact, they have often done well by doing no good. But doing no good is either beginning to catch up with them, as evidenced by anti-trust cases and fines, or they are falling prey to the same economic pressures as many other companies, as evidenced by their reduced profits and recent layoffs. In any case, perhaps the time has come when Microsoft will do neither good nor well. I'm certainly not convinced that Windows 7 will do enough good to do well.

It's not about price

This is a perfect example of the "IT Guy" who does not understand business or the end user at all...

The small price difference is not meaningful; Period. Doubt me? If it were, the iPhone and iPod would have lost out to their less expensive cousins and everyone would be driving a Yugo.

So, if the price difference is $100 or $150 more for a Win7 based Netbook that I can use for almost anything vs the Android that is limited or difficult, that price difference is not an issue.

Also, if I do not get the ability to **EASILY** play my MP3s and movies on the machine, the Android box is not useful.

I bet Seth $1 that in 1 year, Win7 will outsell Android by 10 to 1. Heck, I'll even give him 10:1 odds on that bet.

Yes it is about price...

$150 for android...$1,000,000 in training and conversion costs...Windows is far, far cheaper