Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Preston Gralla's picture
Preston Gralla

Seeing Through Windows

Windows 7's best secret feature

One of Windows 7's most subtle changes may, in fact, have one of the operating system's greatest impacts on the way you compute -- the way in which files and documents are organized. It finally fixes the way that Windows forces you to organize your entire life under the Documents folder.

In earlier versions of Windows, including XP and Vista, you're practically forced to organize all of your files and documents under the Documents folder in your user account. Try to organize your files differently, and you come across so many conflicts with default settings, that you'll throw up your hands and give in.

Windows 7 changes things. Now there's an overall "Libraries" folder under which your other folders live, such as Personal Documents, Public Documents, Downloads, Music, Pictures, and Videos. You can see a screenshot of it, below.

So how is the new Libraries organization different from Documents? You can easily include folders from other locations in Libraries as well --- and that includes even network locations. So you can include folders from servers, for example. And if you've got a home network you can include folders from other PCs as well. In Windows Explorer, click the library locations button on the right side of the screen, and you'll see the dialog box shown below, which lets you add locations.

At first glance, this is far from earth-shaking. But it's a great productivity booster.

I'll have more details about Windows 7 in a fuller review in Computerworld.

Preston Gralla is a contributing editor for Computerworld, and the author of more than 35 books.

What People Are Saying

Worst Feature of W7

I'm happy for you, I'm gonna let you finish, but the Way W7 organizes its files is the Worst Feature ever! I hate the fact that I can never find what I've saved. Instead I have to wait until windows s l o w l y searches my folders for anything that may be a picture. I know where I saved it for goodness sake, just let me go there! Also, when I do painstakingly go through the process of finding it, the next time, it ignores my process and just starts again looking for pictures. Seriously, this feature sucks.

Ummm...

Do I need to proudly wear the common sense badge here and point out the obvious?
Microsoft yet again adds a feature to windows that has been on other operating systems for ages and it gets an article dedicated to it?
Hmmm. Something tells me I won't be returning to this site again.
A little bit of advice:
- Use common sense when writing articles.
- If you don't have common sense, don't write articles.

Wow, that guy is a total

Wow, that guy is a total dink.

common sense

Common sense says 90% of computer users couldn't care less about what other OSes features are, because they don't use them. Most computer users don't even know what Linux is. Some have heard of Tiger/leopard and so on, the reviews got their attention and the price turned them away again.
So yeah, a Windows blog mentioning the concept of libraries does make sense. And the concept is a very useful feature, especially as the same way search does, when you try open a document on a server at work from the library on your PC, windows 7 will open a VPN connection without any prompts or questions. The only thing you'll have to do is to supply the proper password.

The price??? What are youi

The price??? What are youi retarded? tiger and leopard both cost $129. There is one version, and you get everything youi need to not onl enjo the computer, but use it right away. Unlike windows where they cost a fortune, there are 6 different versions and youi get nothing. like windows 7... i install it, and instantly have to install software cause they have nothing to do.

If I were using Tiger,

If I were using Tiger, Leopard, or any other non-Win OS would I still be able to use Adobe Photoshop, Vue6, zbrush? Acid music studio, fruity loops, and stand alone vsti apps? What about my games? (no, I don't mean tetris and pong, but real games)

Every once in a while I decide to try out a new version of Linux only to find that I still can't use the programs I want while enjoying the performance I had under which-ever version of Windows I had been running.

Of course Linux is smaller and easier. Your system can't be crashed by software it can't run.

Of course Macs are less susceptible to viruses. There are so few macs out there compared to the current global saturation by pcs. Viruses need hosts.

I can imagine some early explorers of the Americas saying, "gee whiz, the savages here are way better than the ones in europe because here they are free of small-pox and syphilis(sp) ...and there are no rats here either... I'm staying."
And his fellow explorer says, " I dunno... theres no beer, no opium...hmmm"

Crash free? Error free? Not in my experience. As a graphic designer I've spent quite a bit of time on the phone with Mac techs. The difference between macs and pcs is that when a mac crashes thats it. You may as well unplug the damn thing and take/send it in because trying to deal with the bizarre textual underbelly of the Mac will only lead to holes in the walls and screaming and blood.

I'll stick with the beer and the opium, and just do my best to stay away from the small pox and syphilis ... at least until they figure out all the kinks. Which they haven't yet... as far as I know.

Now you are the retarded

Now you are the retarded one... leopard doesn't cost "$129". It cost $1500+

Where you can legally use Windows on any system, it is against the EULA to use OS X Leopard, and I'd imagine Tiger also, on anything but a Mac.

While it may APPEAR cheap, the fact is that either you get it with a computer, or you are essential paying the $129 for the upgrade.

Also, have you not heard of Win Movie Maker, Media Player, MSN, IE, Windows Mail, Windows Media Center, etc They are all standard plus lots of utilities with Windows Vista.

I'm not sure about Windows 7, but the program is still in bloomin' Beta stage so what do you expect?

Sure, windows ain't perfect, but it's approach and Mac's are quite different. Windows is more "You make the system how you want it with the software you want, and we'll try and make sure it runs"

Mac is more "Everyone can have the same software because its less troublesome than to hope the the user wont do something dumb." Mac isn't a computer you can customize a great deal. The way it comes is likely how it will be until it dies.

Who Cares?

We're all going to Linux anyway.

Where did all the linux

Where did all the linux fanboys all come from suddenly?

Where did we all come from?

Where did we all come from? ...why Windows, of course!