Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Would you buy a Microsoft-less desktop?

IBM, in partnership with Red Hat, Novell, and Canonical, the company behind Ubuntu, is hoping that the answer is yes.

For me, that's a no-brainer. Windows has long been more trouble than its worth. Since Microsoft seems to be seriously considering dumping Windows, it seems they agree with me. So, IBM and Linux friends are suggesting that you stop messing with Windows and go with a business desktop based on one of the three major Linux distributions and an IBM/Lotus software stack instead.

The plan is to put the Lotus Notes client, Sametime IM client and the OpenOffice-based Symphony office suite on top of your choice of Red Hat desktop Linux, Ubuntu Linux or Novell's SLED (SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop). At the same time, on the server side, all three distributions will be offering pre-installs of the Domino Notes Server 8.5 and other IBM server software on their Linux server offerings.

You, however, wouldn't have to worry about installing all this software. Well, you could if you wanted to, but the real plan is to get OEMs (original equipment manufacturers), VARs (value added resellers), and system integrators to install the package on PCs. All you'd need to do is buy the PC, which would come not just with an operating system, but with a full integrated business desktop as well.

At one time, I would have applauded this idea, but I also would have really doubted that it would go anywhere. There were just too many people who wouldn't even consider buying a Windows-less PC. That was then. This is now.

Today, Dell, HP, Lenovo, Asus and a host of other PC vendors are already selling desktops and laptops with pre-installed Linux. And, as Kevin Cavanaugh, IBM Lotus Software's VP, pointed out, "The slow adoption of Vista among businesses and budget-conscious CIOs, coupled with the proven success of a new type of Microsoft-free PC in every region, provides an extraordinary window of opportunity for Linux."

I couldn't agree more. I also really like how this package will push the window open even more. With the IBM/Lotus software package, business users also get a complete, solid as a rock, desktop suite. E-mail, calendering, contacts, IM, word processor, spreadsheet, and presentation, it's all in there. You could put this desktop in front of 95% of all business workers and it would give them 100% of everything they needed.

At the same time, because it's Linux-based, this do-it-all business desktop would also be cheaper to administer since almost all of the security risks from viruses and malware disappear along with Windows. Any fair comparison between one of these Linux desktops and its Windows equivalent will show that the Linux system will be cheaper to buy in the first place and to maintain.

I think this plan has real possibilities. What do you think? Would you buy a Microsoft-less desktop for your office?

What People Are Saying

Would you buy a Microsoft-less desktop?

I guess today, Dell, HP, Lenovo, Asus and a host of other PC vendors are already selling desktops and laptops with pre-installed Linux. So its not a new thing!

Ubuntu on refurbished PC

I recently opened a business selling refurbished and used computers. Loading Ubuntu 8.04 LTS on these systems was a no-brainer. My customers love the fact that software is free and provide the same functionality. Many also have commented that they like the fact that these systems are being kept out of the landfills. I also have had several customers bring their new Windows boxes in to make them into dual boots.
If it wasn't for Ubuntu I could not have done this.

Already have

I moved to Ubuntu because:

1. It's free and easy to use.
2. I receive a new, free OS update (and new application versions where applicable) every 6 months (versus several years with Windows...which do not include new, free application updates).
3. The update manager continually updates EVERYTHING I have installed on my machine (not just Microsoft apps).
4. It boots and runs faster than any Windows machines I have ever owned.
5. I do not have to buy and upgrade additional spyware and virus programs like I did with Windows.
6. I don't have to continually defrag the harddrive.
7. The system requirements (memory, disk, CPU) are lighter and thus less expensive than say Windows Vista, so the same machine can last me much longer (and I can even resurrect old hardware that doesn't run Windows well anymore).
8. Most additional programs I use are free and available in a central location (the package manager).
9. The Ubuntu support community is awesome, if I do have a problem.
10. Different desktop environments are available (GNOME, KDE, XFCE, etc.), if I want/need something different.
11. It is starting to be offered pre-installed on new Dell and HP (customized version of Ubuntu) machines, so I don't even have to install it anymore.

What about SharePoint

First off, ledt me state that there are many things that I think Microsoft should be doing differently, but no one here seems to be aware of the acceleration in the business use of SharePoint services. It is growing fast and looks to me like it is probably the best reason to move to Office 2007. Perhaps Wine can handle it, but there would have to be a strong MS presence to make SharePoint viable. While none of the SharePoint apps are top of the line, they are all functional. There are undoubtably linux apps that can replace each module, but the integration between those modules and Office would be very difficult if not impossible to duplicate.
Again, I am not a huge MS fan and would love to see Linux flourish in a business environment, but I would be very interested to hear from the more informed readers about this issue. SharePoint use in business is growing like a weed.

Linux only for me

After years of building my own dual boots I finally decided I didn't have the time and bought a Dell with Ubuntu. I love it and there is no Microsoft in the house. My wife and kids use my old machine (I built it in 2000) with openSuse 10.3 and it runs faster than my work laptop with Windows XP. (we are hoping to skip Vista)

MS Free 4 Me 2!

Actually any computer I purchase (prebuilt) never gets started with MS on it. I almost always first boot with a Linux cd in the bay.

I've never went through the process of getting my MS tax money back, but some day maybe. I'm still totally stoked you can order a few notebooks from more and more companies with Linux or NO OS installed.

Wonder if Mac will ever offer one of their machines with out the $150 Mac Tax? I love my MacBook Pro and even use Mac OS X quite a bit, but nothing feels better than booting into Linux (Usually Ubuntu) and doing my work.

Other than at work where I

Other than at work where I have no choice, I am blessedly microsoft free. I started toying with various Linux distributions three years ago and settled on Ubuntu two years ago without ever looking back.

On the money

IBM/Lotus has been continually adapting their platform to support an integrated and heterogeneous environment. Their 8.5 client (still in beta) is very impressive on Linux, Mac and Windows.

What makes the OCCS so compelling is that it is not an either/or product. It's a development architecture that includes e-mail and instant messaging. It's secure (no virus's) and works with different LDAP sources, programming languages, and is time tested.

Mac for the suits in Cloud City, Windows for those one-off applications, and OCCS for the rest of us.

The traditional reasons for

The traditional reasons for running Windows were: (1) no viable alternatives, (2) no viable alternatives to Microsoft's Office suite of programs.

Both of those reasons are giving way, both to alternative software (Linux, OpenOffice, less so Lotus), as well as the liberation of data / content from proprietary binary file formats. The latter remains true despite Microsoft's heavy-handed attempts to confound open standars with its OOXML "standard"...

Would I run a Microsoft-less computer? Yes -- in fact I already do -- Unbuntu Linux...

even tho u mis-spelled

even tho u mis-spelled Ubuntu by one letter, i love your point and i apologize for the obvious ms windows fan for pointing that out and for that rude obviously ms windows fan for not appreciating the meaning of your post/comment or what it's called here on this forum...

I absolutely enjoy Ubuntu, LinuxMint, SuSE, Fedora, and Red Hat. I LOVE all of the Linux (Linus) distro's that I've come across so far! I plan to check out even more of them, like Mandriva (spelling?), and Slackware, and others that I don't know how to spell.

But, 6 months ago, I was brand new to using Linux and now just from "google-ing" I can use the command line to securely copy files, securely connect to remote Linux computers that I am running, change file permissions, find files that are anywhere in the filesystem (C: drive for MS peeple), create/burn iso's, create "folders" (directories), and files.

I started with a used Vista Home Basic Dell Laptop at home. Vista's registry and GUI hogged the CPU, RAM,and disk space so that my 1 GB RAM, 2 x 1.8 GHz CPUs, and 120 GB hdd were useless. I couldn't run more than 2 applications at once and Firefox didn't work correctly. (I really find that using IE as a web browser is very insecure since it runs with "admin" (root) privileges. Because of this setup with all Microsoft Windows Operating Systems (MS Windows OS), they are very prone to contracting viruses! Why would you allow your Word processor to run as system admin (root)???? So why would you allow your web browser to do that?? even worse! That is a bad idea! My fiance contracted a virus on his MS Windows computer running XP Professional SP3 just by typing in a url in the IE browser!!!

I found out how powerful the terminal was and how it is necessary for completing many complex operations with a quick line of commands and options. You can't accomplish that with a GUI tool or GUI application.

I was TRYING to use Vista because it was already installed on the used laptop I bought, but I HATED it! I have used many previous versions of MicroSoft, but this took the cake for me. I hated User Account Control, the way the operating system indexes files, how much resources the GUI used, and did not appreciate that the power management tools did not work for my Dell laptop. (uh, hello, isn't there a MS/Dell partnership?).

The gmome and Kde desktop for Linux has even more eyecandy than the ms windows os has. You can have many different desktops and make them rotate as a sphere or cylinder. You can download (for free) many different display themes, which you can't in Wnidows.

With a free Linux operating system, you get (for free or free download ) all of the "office" applications and more! It's fairly easy to set up email and file encryption with Linux. And why do people think that they can email sensitive, personal info???? Email is not secure unless you encrypt it. All distros of Linux that I've played with make it very easy to set up keys to encrypt/decrypt emails between parties that you set up. MS Windows people, please stop emailing your date of birth, ssn, place of birth, birthdate, and name. I've seen so many packets like that. The average person just wants a machine that he/she feels is easy to use and THEN wonders maybe, whether it is safe and secure!!!

Ubuntu is the first distro that I've encountered (although there are many) that has kept this in mind when designing the kernel, shell, GUI tools, and applications. I think that if/when/has-it-already- caught-on in the US, Ubuntu will be the computer buying consumer's choice. Free "office suite," free upgrades, and free security updates, as well as application updates! Why wouldn't you discard a MS Windows OS and use a new Linux OS for home use like LinuxMint or Ubuntu???? Why would you want to pay hundreds of dollars to use an operating system that does not allow you to learn or control it?

I sure as heck didn't and that's how I ended up seeking out and finding Linux! Not only do I love freedom, free software, but I really love to learn how the operating system works, how it interacts with the user, and the hardware! The ONLY reason that MS Windows is popular is that generally, most people aren't out to learn how something works, they just want it to work. (By the way, Ubuntu ((Debian Linux kernel 2.6... works on all of the hardware that I've tested it on, not to mention that with the help pages and the terminal, I've learned quite a lot of Linux and now I am getting into the development side so that I can contribute back! AND it was FUN and EASY to learn!!!). And I think that this is why Canonical helped develop Ubuntu. There is a need to provide a desktop Linux that addresses this issue. And! in the long run, will help convert more Linux fans! I think that's great!

There's more room for the user to configure and customize a Linux operating system than with any other type of OS! You can do more, learn more, and share it with others! Linux is amazing!

Sincerely,
Amanda Geheb