Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


XP just won't die

Microsoft will never admit that Vista was a major mistake, but it was. People who tried it, hated it. Businesses have stuck with XP, or are moving to Macs or desktop Linux. Microsoft knows it too. That's why Microsoft is, out of the public limelight, enabling white-box computer manufacturers to keep selling XP well into 2009.

What Microsoft is doing this time is its letting the smaller distributors and OEMs (original equipment manufacturers) -- not the major PC vendors like HP and Dell -- place their final orders for Windows XP OEM licenses by Jan. 31, 2009, and take delivery of those orders through May 30.

For you, that means you'll be able to keep buying XP Pro on your PCs well into the fall of 2009. You may need to ask for it, you may have to pay more, but it will be available.

This Windows news, first reported by CRN, which I've since confirmed by calling some of my reseller and distributor friends, comes as no surprise. In October, Microsoft decided to officially let distributors and OEMs get XP licenses until January 30th 2009. What's new is that while they still need to get their orders in by then, they can still get media deliveries until May 30.

Want to bet that Microsoft will extend its XP Pro deadlines again? I'm dead sure they will unless they get Windows 7 out by then.

What People Are Saying

It's a productivity issue

It isn't about being Luddites. It is a huge economic consideration every time a company adopts new software, which extends far beyond the cost of licenses. The viability of specialty and legacy apps is a major issue. More, though, it becomes a productivity issue. Time is money.

Most companies simply do not need super whiz bang graphics, they need the ability to process words and numbers efficiently. Most business is deadline driven. Perhaps you have noticed that there is an inverse proportion equation that applies when the more pressing the deadline, the more time it takes to learn a new process to complete the same task.

Trying to force a new interface on people who are struggling to do the work of several in this pinched economy is unrealistic. Not all companies have the luxury of staff trainers and IT support.

I am a consultant -- read I have to buy my own software and do my own support -- working with other consultants who are not writers but who are writing instructional material and developing PowerPoint presentations using very specific guidelines. To make this easier for people who are not "power users" of MS Office, macro-enhanced templates were developed. You guessed it, the macros don't work with the new software.

An obvious solution would have been for MS to have built the product so one could opt for the familiar menus and toolbars. Remember how MS Word made it easy for people migrating from WordPerfect? How difficult would it have been to create a virtual assistant that would "watch" what the user does, then offer to demonstrate how the same task would be performed using the new tools?

Yes, I know, they have provided online tutorials, but if you need a quick answer about how to do something, chances are you do not have time to sit through 40 minutes of video. This is particularly annoying when you already know how to do whatever it is.

"it becomes a productivity

"it becomes a productivity issue. Time is money."

"Most companies simply do not need super whiz bang graphics, they need the ability to process words and numbers efficiently. Most business is deadline driven"

Are you listening up at Redmond?

Change the underpinnings if you will, but leave alone our familiar working environment.

ALSO: don't force us to buy new machines. If you do we'll retaliate and buy Macs.

Macs in the workplace

The place where I work as an assistant administrator is considering switching. The biggest wall Microsoft has is macros, no matter how hard I try to make a Java equivalent it just doesn't meet the speed or integration of VB macros. Now this pisses me off a lot. My Job would be a lot easier on a UNIX like platform.

Vista SP1 works just fine

I am using Vista SP1 right now, and it works just fine. (No, I don't hate it.)

Silly Vista Bashers are stuck in the pre-SP1 past.

Get used to Vista and keep up to date.

Well, all I have to say is that to learn computers, use it. Just play around with it. People say that computers in general are not user friendly. Well, haha, if my dad (almost 60) can learn computers, well, anyone can!!! He is not at all good at electronics and he is doing fine with computers for the most part. You just got to be willing to learn. I would like to encourage people to take the time to learn new programs like Windows Vista and now Windows 7 if and when it comes out. Yeah, the programs maybe a little more challenging, but its always good to be stretched a little, isn't it? In other words, isn't good to have new challenges? Now at the same time, a question comes to mind with Windows XP Pro. Its still being produced while an even new Windows model is in production. Windows XP would now be like 2 steps down from Windows 7. Therefor its getting outdated fast and meaning also that we might start to experience problems with XP since its getting out of date fast. So friends, who are reading this, I again encourage you to just take a little time and learn Vista, at least and if not, Windows 7. Then once you feel comfortable with these, you can purchase the upgrades and save money in the long run. Good luck!

"its always good to be

"its always good to be stretched a little, isn't it? In other words, isn't good to have new challenges?"

Are you some kind of hobbyist?

My work provides me with my challenges and I'm stretched enough just as it is.

If I wanted more computing challenge I would buy some flavor of Linux, not VISTA!

Less Challenge

More challenge? in using Linux...? I got so tired of being on full alert for bugware, viruses and malware and followed all the good practices of constantly updated, anti-virus, anti-spy/sleeperware AND soft firewall. After struggling through driver hell on the second round of the clean, format, and reinstall ritual, I tried the penguin on a lark, and was amazed at how easy two of the distro's installed (PCLinuxOS, and Ubuntu - no driver hell). Better yet, have been system stable and bugware free (e.g. no infections or bugs) for 2+ years now. Plus the hardware seems to really scream now despite all of the boxes being older vintage. I went to this to LESSON my challenge. If I ever ran a business one of these distro's with the paid support over windows (or Mac) would be a slam dunk.

GUI's put it simply, vista

GUI's

put it simply, vista is much more beautiful than xp. Ran xp x86/x64, vista 32, and windows 7 prebetas.

Vista outperforms xp as long as you have a decent graphics card. Helps that I have SLI with 1 gb of graphics memory.

Point being.. In a year or two mainstream laptops will be x64 running 8 gig of ram and hopefully windows 7's new warp10 technology will be able to assist "graphic cardless" pc's in running its pretty visuals. Note that windows 7 really is just vista on steroids. It's going to live up to the hype.
It really is an improvement.

Stop hating on vista; it simply wasnt ready for its time. Everyone is still stuck on x86 4gb max RAM architecture.

"Stop hating on vista; it

"Stop hating on vista; it simply wasnt ready for its time."

That argument can go so many ways its not funny.

If all we did with our PCs was play games...

maybe the previous comment would be relevant. Many of us still look at text and static images... Why on Earth should we pay for a graphics rendering farm when all we need is a PC? Hundreds of millions of PCs are used in business where game-playing is almost certainly a time-waster, not a money-maker. Hundreds of millions of PCs are used to browse the web, e-mail and write documents. We do not need or want a 3D visual experience from our PCs. For us, Vista offers nothing. I have been able to do a 3D desktop for years in GNU/Linux but I do not use it because it gets in the way of what I want to do.